Jews of Color Stake Their Claim to Mainstream Leadership Roles

Rabbi Jacqueline Mates-Muchin was in college when someone asked her boyfriend (and now husband) how he would deal with an interfaith marriage. Both partners in the relationship were Jewish, but the questioner made the assumption she was not because she is Asian.

“And that was hurtful,” said Mates-Muchin, the senior rabbi at Oakland’s Temple Sinai since 2015 and the first Chinese American rabbi. “When people focus on how you look, I think that discounts who I am and my knowledge and my feeling of belonging.”

a black woman in glasses and a white shirt with a determined expression

Ilana Kaufman started the Jews of Color Field Building Initiative to train the next generation of leaders. (Photo/Michael Fox)

Jews of color, who make up an ever-increasing slice of the American Jewish population, deal with overt and subtle prejudice on a regular basis.

Rabbi Jacqueline Mates-Muchin
Rabbi Jacqueline Mates-Muchin

They are made to feel like outsiders at High Holiday services. They are bombarded with quizzical stares and questions at synagogues. They are underrepresented in leadership roles at mainstream Jewish institutions, from JCCs and Federations to philanthropic organizations.

“Racism has not allowed the Jewish community to understand ourselves as multiracial,” said Ilana Kaufman, who launched the Jews of Color Field Building Initiative last August to address some of the inequities.

“We’ve done an amazing job of excising Jews of color out of the narrative. We’re trained to think they are not Jewish,” said Kaufman, who is preparing for her daughter’s bat mitzvah in April at Congregation Beth El in Berkeley.

Kaufman’s organization is committed to preparing a new generation to step into those Jewish leadership roles throughout the community. It’s the early stages of an effort to make sure Jews of color are represented in ways that reflect their growing numbers, not just in the Bay Area but also nationwide.

The Bay Area-centered organization uses its Facebook page to promote and support the work of Jews of color, such as a Feb. 13 talk at Temple Sinai by Mates-Muchin titled “Chinese and Jewish.” Kaufman also runs webinars to create virtual community for Jews of color, no matter where they live.

The Field Building Initiative — which is supported by the Walter and Elise Haas Fund, the Jim Joseph Foundation, the Leichtag Foundation and the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation — also is awarding grants to individuals and entities that are part of the new generation. The first six grants awarded last year went to groups such as Jews in All Hues and the Jewish Multiracial Network, which will use the money to help host the second national Jews of Color Convening in Massachusetts in June.

JOC leaders invited to a think tank convened by the Leichtag Foundation in September 2016, including Ilana Kaufman (top right)
JOC leaders invited to a think tank convened by the Leichtag Foundation in September 2016, including Ilana Kaufman (top right)

Paula Pretlow is one of the rare local examples of a Jew of color in a leadership position at a major Jewish institution. The San Francisco resident serves on the boards of San Francisco’s Congregation Emanu-El and the Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation.

“I’m usually the only Jew of color in most rooms that I enter,” said Pretlow, who also serves on the boards of the Kresge Foundation, the San Francisco Symphony and Northwestern University. She believes that will change as more people of color attain prominent positions in high-profile businesses and mainstream Jewish organizations.

She said her certainty about her own sense of belonging insulates her from some of the uncomfortable stares aimed at herself and her fellow Jews of color.

Paula Pretlow
Paula Pretlow

Back when she lived in the East Bay, Pretlow started attending Temple Isaiah in Lafayette, where the rabbi encouraged her to come to services more often. “So I came and sat in the back, and then I challenged myself to move a little farther forward. I didn’t know how I would be accepted. Then I joined a b’nai mitzvah class, so I very quickly found my people. If people thought I didn’t belong there, they never had the guts to say it to me.”

Tonda Case of Oakland, a national board member of the Jewish social justice group Bend the Arc, said she still gets looks that say “What are you doing here?” when she attends Shabbat services while traveling.

“Then comes the question, ‘Oh, are you Jewish? How are you Jewish?’” said Case, who sent both of her daughters to Oakland Hebrew Day School. “Because Jewish looks like white Ashkenazi Jewish to people. The thing is, that’s not what Jewish means. I am not white, I am not Ashkenazi — so am I not Jewish? Am I an interloper? Do I have to depend on your kindness to be able to walk in the door and join Shabbat services? I say, ‘Absolutely not.’”

Despite those challenges, Kaufman said she sees signs of some changing attitudes, in part simply because there are so many more Jews of color today. Intermarriage has increased in recent decades, and along with it the percentage of non-white Jews.

The 2018 Portrait of Bay Area Jewish Life commissioned by the S.F.-based Jewish Community Federation found that 25 percent of local Jewish households include a person who is not white. Among 18- to 34-year-olds, 38 percent of households include a person of color.

The next step in gaining greater acceptance and visibility, Kaufman said, is to get a better idea of how many people identify as Jews of color across the country. She has commissioned such a national survey, to be completed this spring.

A 2015 demographic study by the Steinhardt Social Research Institute at Brandeis University estimated that 11.2 percent of the nation’s 7.16 million Jews were non-white (compared with 35 percent of the general U.S. population).

Kaufman expects there to be a higher percentage of Jews of color in her survey. She points to a recent talk she gave in Phoenix, where she asked the primarily white, Modern Orthodox congregants how many people knew a Jew of color. Many who raised their hands said they had Jewish grandchildren who were not white.

The survey results will allow the Jews of Color Field Building Initiative to push for more leadership roles for Jews of color.

Local activists and leaders met in July 2018 in Berkeley to strategize about the new Jews of Color Field Building Initiative.
Local activists and leaders met in July 2018 in Berkeley to strategize about the new Jews of Color Field Building Initiative.

“It is our job to change the paradigm, and the survey will help that happen,” Kaufman said. “Let’s say the survey finds 20 percent are Jews of color — then I’ll tell organizations, I want you to leave 20 percent of your boardroom empty until you can find people of color.”

Case, of Bend the Arc, said when she’s the only Jew of color at a meeting, she thinks about the richness that group is missing.

Tonda Case
Tonda Case

“As our numbers grow, as the demographics change, it’s really important that [Jewish] leadership changes to reflect that,” Case said. “Otherwise, we are at a disadvantage. In this country and around the world, we have seen what that looks like when people [of color] are not at the table.”

Mates-Muchin said she’s seen progress in synagogues welcoming Jews of color since she was ordained 17 years ago, but that much work remains.

“I think we just have to be open to challenging ourselves and our assumptions, and sometimes recognizing we’re wrong. To be really reflective of who we are and how we might be able to broaden our understanding of who our community is,” she said, “especially when it comes to [our] diversity. We need to be more open about what that means, and the way we talk about things has to be more reflective of the people we are.”

Kaufman said Judaism has to be willing to bend its “Ashkenormative” standards to incorporate more multicultural ideas.

“What do our rabbinical schools need to think about? How do you apply Torah in a multiracial way?” she asked. “Then we start to rethink clergy training school. Then we start to rethink what curriculum looks like in religious schools. We need to make that shift.”

One of the groups Kaufman and others focus on is teenage Jews of color, who often struggle with dueling identities and feelings of not being fully accepted — either by Jews or by people of color. In November, more than a dozen such teens met to share stories and discuss the challenges of being a Jew of color.

One of the workshop leaders was Lindsey Newman, a project manager at S.F.-based Be’chol Lashon, which supports Jews of color as part of its mission of advocating for racial, ethnic and cultural diversity. Be’chol Lashon runs a multicultural Jewish camp each summer at Walker Creek Ranch in West Marin.

Newman said changing demographics and cultural assumptions should allow younger Jews of color to be more comfortable in their own skin than their elders.

“Jews have always been diverse, have always been a multicultural people. I see that as part of our inherent identity and one of our strengths,” Newman said. “But I think in 21st-century America, young Jews — whether they are of color or not — are growing up in a more multicultural world.

“They’re coming to expect that their world will embrace differences in a way that maybe was not true for older generations. For Judaism to be able to stay relevant, we have to celebrate differences that exist, and embrace them.”

Source: “Jews of Color Stake Their Claim to Mainstream Leadership Roles,” Rob Gloster J – The Jewish News of Northern California, January 25, 2019

CASJE Announces Recipients of Small Grants for Research on the Practice of Jewish Education

CASJE (The Consortium for Applied Studies in Jewish Education) has announced three grants for research projects focused on the practice of Jewish education. The grants, up to $30,000 each, were selected from proposals submitted in response to an open call. The winning projects cover different age groups and settings of Jewish education, will be completed by the end of 2019, and will be shared broadly with the field.

The grant recipients and their projects are:

~Dr. Lauren Applebaum, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion; Anna Hartman, Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago; and Dr. Sivan Zakai, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion

Exploring How Preschool Children (3-4 years old) in Jewish Early Childhood Settings Think about Israel

While much communal attention is focused on how teens and young adults think about Israel, this study will address the very youngest learners in the Jewish community, asking “How do preschool children think about and understand Israel?” As this question is crucial for both scholarship and practice, this project is designed as a unique and powerful practitioner and researcher partnership. Researchers will create a developmentally-appropriate research protocol using group interviews, elicitation/provocation exercises, and teacher documentation. Early childhood practitioners from three Jewish early childhood centers will be trained to use it to uncover the ways that their students think about Israel. Multiple rounds of coding and analysis will allow both practitioners and researchers to shape and reflect on the analysis before findings are shared in both practitioner and scholarly venues.

~Dr. Sarah Benor, Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion; Dr. Netta Avineri, Middlebury Institute of International Studies; and Rabbi Nicki Greninger Director of Education, Temple Isaiah (Lafayette, CA)

Hebrew Education in Supplementary Schools

This study will investigate how Hebrew is taught and perceived at American Jewish supplementary schools. Which types of Hebrew (Liturgical, Biblical, Modern) and which skills (decoding, recitation, conversation) are emphasized? Phase one is a survey of 250+ school directors around the United States, focusing on rationales, goals, teaching methods, curricula, and teacher selection. Phase two involves classroom observations and stakeholder surveys at 10 schools with diverse approaches. Researchers will first determine how teachers teach, use, and discuss Hebrew and how students respond. Researchers will then survey students, parents, clergy, and teachers about their rationales, goals, and perceptions of their program. This project represents a collaboration among researchers and practitioners committed to theorizing how Hebrew is and might be approached in American Jewish educational institutions. Understanding this will enable future interventions to better align goals and methods among educators, congregations, and families, thereby strengthening diaspora Hebrew education.

~Dr. Bethamie Horowitz, New York University; and Joshua Krug and Amanda Winer, Ph.D. Students in Education and Jewish Studies, New York University

What are the Terms of Engagement? Israel-based Gap Year Programs as Sites for Investigating Israel Education for North American Jews

Israel-based programs for North American Jews in their gap year between high school and college are a significant locale for Israel education, but one that has not received much scholarly attention. Because the programs are situated in contemporary Israel for a period of 9 months,they function as sites of Israel education in ways that are hard to replicate in North American settings. This project will investigate the educational conceptions of two such programs –  The Young Judea Year Course, and the Kivunim Program – with particular attention to their formulations of how and why young American Jews are expected to relate to current day Israel, and how these ideas play out in practice. At a time when there are many questions about the nature of the relationship between American Jews and Israel, this inquiry will provide a window for examining educators’ views about what 21st century “Jewish citizenship” could or should entail for the rising generation of North American Jews.

Upon completing the research, grantees will share their findings with the broader field of Jewish education at conferences, via social media, and in publications.

CASJE is a community of researchers, practitioners, and philanthropic leaders committed to sharing knowledge to improve Jewish education.

Source: eJewishPhilanthropy

Come Together to Support Jewish Educators

CASJE – The Consortium for Applied Studies in Jewish Education – recently launched a new project supported by the William Davidson Foundation and the Jim Joseph Foundation for comprehensive research on the pipeline and “career arc”of educators working in Jewish education. This is a welcome development for all who care about supporting Jewish educators and advancing the field in which they work.

From a research and funder perspective, it is worth exploring how and why a project of this substance and level of depth was developed. Have no doubt, laying the groundwork for research of this scope takes time and resources.

We started earlier this year in New York City, in the midst of a snowstorm that would bring 8” of snow by the end of the day. CASJE convened a small group of leaders in the field of Jewish educator preparation. They came together, supported by the William Davidson Foundation, to discuss challenges that the field faces and potential research topics that could address these challenges.

This conversation was facilitated using CASJE’s signature process for a “Problem Formulation Convening (PFC).” It was the first conversation of several that would guide a proposed research agenda for the field to consider. We want to identify best practices and apply research results to make the practice of Jewish education more effective.

One of the most impressive aspects of the day was that participants raised the level of discourse to concentrate on the field as a whole. Not a single person offered opinions solely from the individual and self-serving vantage point of their own organization or program – a sign of true leadership.

Several challenges for the Jewish educator field were highlighted and appreciated. For example:

  • educators across the board are not adequately valued in terms of status and recognition, compensation, and development;
  • hence, it is difficult to attract and recruit potential quality educators to choose a career as a Jewish educator;
  • the field’s high-quality educators are not being retained and adequately developed into education leaders; and
  • the field lacks a central system or structure for policy making.

The first three challenges are known and discussed by many in the field and by field leaders. And while the last example may be obvious – yes, there is no governmental or other umbrella agency that holds itself accountable to provide a Jewish education for every Jewish child as is the case for public education – it is a challenge that largely has flown under the radar by those most likely to understand the context and be equipped to propose remedies. It is worth contemplating why this is so. One view is that it is not surprising that Jewish education is diffused, decentralized, and perhaps even chaotic, given that those adjectives apply even more powerfully to the world of general education in the U.S.

Historians and analysts of contemporary American education reform know well that policy setting and implementation are largely activities left to the states and local school districts; and that for all kinds of complicated and fascinating reasons the founders of the American republic eschewed national control of schooling, a stance that has been both a virtue and an impediment.

A second point noted by those at the PFC is that, in the context of Jewish education, private philanthropists essentially are the de-facto policy makers and influencers for the field. A parallel again can be drawn to secular education, a field where philanthropists such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Broad Foundation, and the Walton Family Foundation have invested significant resources to reform the public education system in the U.S. – and also have received substantial positive and negative criticism from this involvement.

This all raises a larger and important set of questions to consider:

  • Are Jewish education foundations up to the task of setting policy for the field?
  • Is there enough consensus across the relatively small group of funders to provide a meaningful and cohesive set of policy recommendations and investments?
  • Are there commonly viewed challenges, solutions, outcomes and measures?

Undoubtedly, the answer to the last question is “no.” Those common structures, understandings, and resources simply do not exist. But even with the current lack of alignment in funders’ vision for Jewish education, one promising effort to promote and support is the application of research to practice.

The field of Jewish education can be similar to the U.S. public education system’s vision for accountability and continual improvement in that much of education research is funded by the government and by philanthropists and is conducted across universities and research firms big and small. This is the critically important role Jewish education philanthropy can play to have a real and positive influence on the field and on the future. Let’s do more of that together.

Stacie Cherner is a Senior Program Officer at the Jim Joseph Foundation. Menachem “Manny” Menchel is the Program Officer for Jewish Education at the William Davidson Foundation.

cross-posted in eJewishPhilanthropy

Moishe House Explores ‘Little Shtetls’ of Jewish Learning

Moishe House, a program for Jewish young adults that has been growing steadily throughout the United States and internationally since its inception nearly 13 years ago, is now grappling with a key question: How far should it go in providing concrete definitions and setting requirements for the content of its peer-led Jewish learning programs while still empowering its young leaders, in their 20s and early 30s, to be bold and creative in how they engage with that content?

At a “Jewish Education Summit” held Nov. 6-8 at its headquarters in The Hive at Leichtag Commons in Encinitas in northern San Diego County, Moishe House invited Jewish academics and educators to explore the extent to which its learning activities should incorporate Judaism’s core texts or ideas in order to be considered a proper Jewish education.

“We’re all asking the same question: For young adults in 2018, what does it mean to live a Jewish life? What does it mean to craft Jewish learning and own your own Jewish experience?” said Rabbi Brad Greenstein, senior director of Jewish learning at Moishe House.

Since January 2006, when it started opening Moishe Houses that support Jewish young adults who live together and host Jewish programming for their friends and community, the nonprofit organization has grown to more than 110 houses in 27 countries (including six in Los Angeles, one in Orange County and two in San Diego County), according to its website. It also provides support for leaders of peer-led retreats and a program called Moishe House Without Walls. Last  May, Moishe House said that during the previous year more than 50,000 young adult Jews were active participants in its programs, which drew a total annual attendance of more than 200,000.

“Moishe House is interesting because they are committed to democratizing Jewish education by bringing it to people’s living rooms,” said Miriam Heller Stern, national director of the School of Education and associate professor at Hebrew Union College-Jewish Institute of Religion. “Anyone can teach, sit with the text and make sense of it. It’s a reflection of the American zeitgeist but comes into tension with traditional beliefs about how much one needs to know to access those texts.” 

Summit participants included representatives of educational organizations such as The Pardes Institute of Jewish Studies, the Shalom Hartman Institute and Mechon Hadar; the community-service organization Repair the World; and Moishe House funders such as the Jim Joseph Foundation and the William Davidson Foundation. (In addition to reporting on the event for the Journal, I was invited to participate in the discussions.)

We have to rethink that assumption of what education has to look like. … a formal structure to teach what used to be learned through living.
— Miriam Heller Stern

The sessions reflected diverse perspectives on Jewish education.

“Seeing spiritual homelessness and social isolation, you solve for ‘belonging,’ ” said speaker Casper ter Kuile, executive director and director of possibility for the Impact Lab at The On Being Project, and co-host of the Harry Potter and the Sacred Text podcast. Ter Kuile, who is not Jewish, brings together leaders in the emerging field of secular and sacred community innovation. He talked about unbundling and remixing traditional religious practice through several lenses. For instance, the Catholic Church used to be a full-service institution helping people to be “hatched, matched and dispatched,” he quipped, but is now experiencing a loss of popularity as people find other communities to serve their religious needs.

On the summit’s second day, Orly Michaeli, founder of the women’s spirituality retreat Wominyan, asked how Jewish educators should define “Jewish text.” Michaeli, who grew up in Guatemala, said that text is a measure of Jewish content for Judaism in the U.S., whereas in Latin America, Jewish content is derived from a sense of peoplehood centered on community and tradition. 

Stern, in her address, noted that for the last 150 years “school was synonymous with Jewish education.” Before that, she said, Jewish life was learned by living in the shtetl, where people had no choice but to live Jewishly. 

“We have to rethink that assumption of what education has to look like and be structured,” Stern said. “How do we teach the next generation to be Jewish if we don’t live in the enclave and learn by doing because everyone else was? [We need] a formal structure to teach what used to be learned through living.”

Moishe House, Stern said, was “creating little modern shtetls” that to an extent were duplicating this way of learning.

While much of the summit was involved in discussions of text and theory, Aaron Henne, founder of the Jewish theater company Theatre Dybbuk, led a session that encouraged participants’ physical movement. Groups read textual accounts of the Lilith story and then used their bodies to create “snapshots” representing the story’s narrative ideas. 

A conversation led by Yehudah Webster, director of B’nai Mitzvah Campaign, an innovative bar/bat mitzvah tutoring company in New York City, focused on where bias meets Jewish education. 

“We’re oriented in a particular norm which doesn’t allow for multiplicity of experiences,” Webster said. Educators should acknowledge that others’ Jewish experiences may be very different from their own, he added, and he challenged those present to raise the visibility of untold narratives — stories coming from Sephardic Jews, Jews of color, LGBTQ Jews, etc. — in a largely “Ashkenormative” Jewish conversation. 

Meanwhile, Greenstein said he was strategizing with Moishe House’s Resident Support team about “what it could look like for residents to create their own holistic Jewish learning plan from the very beginning of their Moishe House experience.” 

“The question I kept coming up with was ‘For what, to what end [are these learning experiences intended]?’ ” Greenstein said. “[At Moishe House] we put a lot of power and decision-making into the educators’ own hands. … The question remains, though: Is text necessary for Jewish education? Do you need a specific anchor that comes from a canonical part of the tradition to be counted as Jewish education? We learned that the realm of Torah is so expansive, but as it continues to expand we’re drawn back to that initial anchor, back to the traditional canonical texts. The question is, how do we make them come alive?”

After the summit concluded, Greenstein summed up the experience.

“We are all engaged in similar work,” he said. “We want Judaism to thrive. If Moishe House can be a catalyst for a Jewish life that’s dynamic and alive, then we’ve done our job.” 

Source: “Moishe House Explores ‘Little Shtetls’ of Jewish Learning,” Esther Kustanowitz, Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, December 5, 2018

Prizmah Working Towards a Vibrant Future for Jewish Day Schools

Jewish day schools fundamentally strengthen the trajectory of Jewish knowledge, identity, community, and leadership. This is a core principle guiding Prizmah: Center for Jewish Day Schools as it begins to implement its new five-year strategic plan, B’Yachad: Towards a Vibrant Future for Jewish Day Schools. The plan—which builds on Prizmah’s past learnings, extensive stakeholder engagement, and a research deep-dive—details the organization’s vision of a thriving, passionate, engaged, and committed network of Jewish day schools that shape our community for generations to come. Prizmah will help unlock the potential of the North American Jewish day schools through strategic investment in four key areas: Deepen Talent, Catalyze Resources, Accelerate Innovation, and Network to Learn.

With this investment, Jewish day schools will be part of a field in which:

  • students graduate exceptionally well-equipped with the academic and social-emotional strengths that enable them to pursue their dreams;
  • graduates’ Jewish identities are deeply enriched to last a lifetime;
  • families are excited to enroll;
  • talented individuals are drawn to the school’s career offerings; and
  • schools have the sustainable resources they need to grow.

Core to Prizmah’s success—and the success of Jewish day schools, educators, leaders, and students—is the recognition that schools and communities are inherently linked. Together, they form a virtuous cycle, wherein investments in the key aspects of thriving Jewish day schools reinforce and embolden one another. Prizmah supports North American Jewish day schools and communities of all sizes and denominations to tackle the diverse needs and challenges of day schools on their path to success. This vision embraces the passion of schools’ leaders and educators, as well as the educational and philosophical differences of schools, which Prizmah serves according to their individual needs.

Leadership is a space filled with risk taking, vulnerabilities, and very often loneliness. Being part of Prizmah’s leadership training gave me a foundation that I know will propel me forward on my professional journey, as well as a community and support system I can rely on to work through any aspect of leadership.
– HEAD OF SCHOOL

While striving for vibrancy, Jewish day schools also face significant challenges. The changing academic, social, and technological needs of today’s youth create need and opportunity to re-think education—just as the demographics, dynamics, and institutions of Jewish communities are also changing. As the cost of education rises and many incomes stagnate, the struggle to provide an affordable Jewish education to all who want it grows, leading to challenges in enrollment. Prizmah creates the space and environments for days schools to explore these challenges and seek solutions together.

As a Head of School from a small community, it can be hard to take a moment to just…breathe. With the mounting pressures of finances, development, assessments, admissions, and H.R. how many moments do we get to learn and problem solve with our peers? Our time at Prizmah’s Small School Retreat and the continued connections after give us the tools for self-care and school-care. – HEAD OF SCHOOL

Prizmah believes that educating Jewish youth is the most important investment to make in their future—as Jews, and as active contributors to society—and in the future of the Jewish community. Vibrant Jewish day schools inspire and nurture young people, prepare them for remarkable and meaningful lives, and enable them to truly thrive. Prizmah works every day to support these schools and their leaders, laying the foundation so that the Jewish community will be empowered and fueled by stronger voices, identities, values, and leadership.

The Jim Joseph Foundation is one of many supporters of Prizmah.

One Story, Many Voices: A Call for Increased Diversity and Equity in Jewish Life and Leadership

“Diversity” might not be the first word that comes to mind when we think about living a Jewish life—but it should be. Our heritage’s creation story—human beings created in the image of the Divine—makes an unequivocal statement that all people, whatever our race, ethnicity, class, culture, language, ability or identity, are infinitely valuable and equal. Our history of oppression teaches us to stand up for—rather than exclude or marginalize—minorities. And even the tradition of reading the Torah aloud, with one voice and many listeners, began with a commitment to embracing the unique differences in how each and every one of us views the world.

The book of Nehemiah tells how Ezra the scribe brought the whole Jewish community together to hear the Torah for the first time, and while the people listened, 13 “interpreters” fanned out into the crowd to interpret the text and make it meaningful to each. From the very beginning, this tale teaches us, the Torah was not meant to have just one meaning; it was intended to be adapted, interpreted and transformed for each listener’s worldview.

I was blessed to learn this deeply moving teaching from Rabbi Amichai Lau-Lavie, founder of Lab/Shul and a Global Justice Fellow of American Jewish World Service (AJWS), at a thought-provoking gathering with leaders of 26 organizations convened by the Jim Joseph Foundation. We were a diverse group representing organizations from across the Jewish community: There were fellow social justice organizations like Bend the Arc and Hazon. Youth and young adult engagement organizations like BBYO, Hillel and Moishe House. Foundations like Wexner and Schusterman. And religious institutions like Union for Reform Judaism, Jewish Theological Seminary, and IKAR.

Like the Torah interpreters of Ezra’s day, each of our organizations was interpreting the stories and lessons of our tradition and applying them to respond to the particular challenges of our day. To take just one example, some of the groups represented at this gathering are using the lessons of Jewish history to inspire solidarity with others seeking freedom—from the Rohingya Muslims of Burma who are being subject to crimes against humanity, to the thousands of asylum seekers crossing our southern border in the hope of a safe life in the U.S. Other organizations are engaging youth to connect with Jewish text, or creating new rituals for observing Jewish holidays in the 21st century.

While the gathering celebrated the beauty of this rainbow of Jewish organizations working on a multitude of different goals, it also highlighted the ways in which we are falling short of our obligation to respect and embrace the diversity among us.

In a powerful session lead by Stosh Cotler, Yavilah McCoy, April Baskin and Cheryl Cook, we heard about the devastating experiences many Jews of color have within our institutions and communities. They recounted people asking Jews of color, “how are you Jewish?” or arriving at synagogues only to be mistaken as janitorial staff because of the color of their skin. Some described their yearning to have Jewish role models who look like them. And others shared a desire to hear more music of their own heritage—from gospel music to Sephardi or Mizrahi Jewish tunes—sung in synagogue and other spaces of Jewish life. We were reminded of the racial and ethnic diversity of the American Jewish community, and the continued work we have to do to embrace our full spectrum of lived experience.

Crucially, we also focused on how we, as Jewish leaders, can promote diversity in our own organizations and programs, first by understanding the various ways—personal, cultural and structural—that people are being marginalized; and then by creating initiatives that foster diversity and proactively work to transform our organizational cultures to address these problems.

Since I’ve returned from this gathering of American Jewish leaders, I’ve been thinking more and more about what it means to embrace the pluralism and diversity within the American Jewish community, in light of my organization’s work to create a truly pluralistic world in which all people of every race, faith, gender, identity, ethnicity and ability can live with dignity and human rights.

In our work at AJWS to promote human rights in 19 countries in the developing world, we work with grantee partners of diverse races, ethnicities, and religious backgrounds worldwide—Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Christians, secular intellectuals, feminists, and many others. This is fundamental to our mission, since AJWS is inspired by the core Jewish notion that all people were created b’tselem Elohim—in the image of God. To create a world in which every person’s dignity is upheld, we promote gender equality in India, supporting girls and young women to make their own choices about marriage, careers and futures. In Kenya, we defend the rights of LGBTI people, supporting organizations that combat homophobia and violence, ensuring that people of all sexual orientations and gender identities can live with dignity. In Mexico, we support a movement of indigenous farmers working to stop discrimination against indigenous people and halt land grabs that rob them of the farms and resources they need for survival.

Just as we work with diverse partners around the world, we are blessed with a relatively diverse staff, with members of our staff from many cultures, faiths, intellectual traditions, and sexual and gender identities. We believe that diversity is not just about who is on our team, but how we tap the talents and different experiences they bring to our mission and work.

To do this, we have begun a diversity, equity, and inclusion initiative to continue to build and sustain a diverse, just and inclusive work environment where all employees—of all races, religions and identities—feel safe and respected. We are celebrating the ways in which we are succeeding, and taking a hard look at the ways in which we are falling short, in order to be a community truly rooted in our core values.

As we work to achieve a diverse, pluralistic and respectful world for all people, we must do the same in the Jewish community. This means we must understand the wide scope and respect the full diversity of diaspora Jewish cultural groups—from the many Ashkenazi traditions, to Mizrahi Jews from the Middle East and North Africa, to Sephardi Jews of Spain—as well those in multi-faith, diverse and hybrid families. That also means respecting religious and secular Jews in their many varieties, and Jews of various world views and ideologies.

To create the kind of pluralistic world we want to live in, we must include those who have never been fully included before, in every society, including the Jewish community. We must challenge restrictive norms that oppress women and foster violence against them. We must take on institutional racism, conscious or not, that affects how we look at (and too often limit) people of every background. We must embrace the dignity of LBGTI people. We must be truly open to “the other” and “welcoming the stranger” in our community and in the broader world.

Just as we are learning, in this authoritarian age, that one authoritarian abets another, we understand that diversity anywhere can catalyze diversity everywhere. That’s our work. Those are our values. That’s who we are. In fact, part of creating a diverse and pluralistic world is creating a diverse and pluralistic Jewish community. And to create a diverse and open Jewish community, we must be situated in a diverse and open world community. These goals cannot be separated and cordoned off from one another. They are one.

The Jim Joseph Foundation gathering provided a significant opportunity for these conversations to take root. I left thinking how powerful it would be if each of the 26 organizations in attendance would take up this mandate, together and in our own communities in real and authentic ways, and to challenge our colleagues throughout the Jewish world to do the same. This would mean a stronger Jewish community for ourselves and a better world for all.

Robert Bank is President and CEO of American Jewish World Service

 

Are Jewish Grandparents a Forgotten Population?

Today’s Jewish grandparents are actively building relationships with their grandchildren. Yet, programming for this generation is lacking. Enter: Jewish Grandparents Network.

Long gone are the apron-clad bubbe who slaved over matzah ball soup and the pipe-smoking zayde who watched the evening news in his Barcalounger. Today’s Jewish grandparents are tech-savvy, active seniors who FaceTime on school nights and fly into town for a weekend with their grandchildren.

According to a report last year by the U.S. Census Bureau, the number of grandparents in the United States is growing. Its population reached 69.5 million in 2014, up from 65.1 million in 2009. Baby Boomers, the youngest of whom turned 50 in 2014, have a total population of 75.4 million.

That’s a lot of grandparents, and yet, the Jewish community is lacking programming and education for Baby Boomers. The problem is nationwide, but Atlanta offers little more than annual Grandparents’ Day at day schools.

Co-founders of Jewish Grandparents Network, David Raphael of Atlanta and Lee Hendler of Baltimore, Md., seek to rectify this oversight.

“The Jewish community has done a wonderful job of supporting young families, but there is a lack of attention given to grandparents,” Raphael said. “By sharing Jewish values and narratives, the most influential members of families are grandparents.”

Flanked by Ron Wolfson (left) and Marshall Duke (right), David Raphael says Jewish grandparents are often undervalued and overlooked.

JGN launched its first program, “Grandma, Grandpa Tell Me a Story,” at The Temple Oct. 28. Ron Wolfson of American Jewish University and Marshall Duke of Emory University shared their stories with about 40 grandparents, talking about the way oral tales play a role in sustaining Jewish traditions and strengthening families.

And on Nov. 5, JGN launched the first national study of Jewish grandparents. Ten Jewish communities, including Atlanta, and five national organizations are partners in the study. It is underwritten by the JGN with support from Hendler, the Jim Joseph Foundation, The Covenant Foundation and Mike Leven.

Engaging Millennials

Grandparents are the most reliable connection to Jewish life and experiences, especially for Millennials who don’t belong to Jewish organizations or necessarily observe many rituals, Hendler said.

David Raphael, co-founder of Jewish Grandparents Network, with his granddaughter, Bina.

She attended a conference on engaging Millennials a few years ago. Frustrated at the lack of attention to Boomers, Hendler recalled talking to organizers about Jewish grandparents. “They were going to write me off. I knew the look I was getting. Nothing was going to happen. The people at table dealing with Millennials could not connect the dots. And yet, I knew from conversations that grandparents are on front lines of the change in family life.”

“Where did they have a mixed-faith wedding? My backyard. Who did they talk to about which rabbi might officiate? Me. What does the Jewish world think is going on? When it comes to the baby’s bris, does it occur to them it will be in my home and they have asked me to help them pick a mohel?”

Study after study reinforces the findings of Raphael and Hendler: Grandchildren cite the relationship with their grandparents as a major reason they identify Jewishly.

For instance, the Cohen Center for Modern Jewish Studies at Brandeis University reported in a 2015 study (“Millennial Children of Intermarriage”): “Having close ties to Jewish grandparents had a direct effect on a variety of outcomes, including identifying as Jewish by religion, celebrating Jewish holidays, feeling a connection to Israel and the Jewish people, and wanting to marry someone Jewish.”

The Cohen Center survey also states: “For all childhood experiences, Jewish grandparents should be viewed as a critical resource, and programs should be designed to leverage their influence.”

Another study of 1,150 Jewish college students, conducted in 2014 by researchers Barry Kosmin and Ariela Keysar, discovered that when grandparents accompanied the students to synagogue and other Jewish settings, they were most likely to feel strong attachments to Israel and the Jewish people.

Additionally, surveys of Birthright Israel alumni reveal that connection to Jewish grandparents is an important predictor of a wide variety of positive Jewish attitudes and practices in adulthood.

That’s because Judaism is so valued by older Jews and they pass that connection on to their grandchildren. According to the Pew Research Center Global Religious Landscape Study of 2015, more than 70 percent of Jews ages 55 and older respond that religion is either very important or important to them.

Goals of Jewish Grandparents Network

Aimed at adults from age 55 to 80, JGN plans to engage those with grandchildren of Jewish and mixed-faith families.

The JGN case study – the basis for which the organization was founded and will be funded – states grandparents are “a living bridge to the past and essential keepers and sharers of family and Jewish narratives, traditions and values.”

JGN maintains that financial support and personal time, including paying for Jewish preschool and taking grandchildren to Tot Shabbat, is the role of today’s Jewish grandparent.

By navigating the “new Jewish family” which includes multifaith, divorced, single parent and LGBTQ families, Jewish grandparents deserve meaningful dialogue and learning opportunities.

JGN is working with a research firm to gather quantitative data on family demographics, beliefs, behaviors and needs of Jewish grandparents. A sample of the survey will be distributed nationally to 1,500 members of synagogues, Jewish community centers and other Jewish organizations.

Raphael, who lives in Sandy Springs, spent his 30-year career with Hillel International creating Jewish opportunities. He values listening, collaboration and building community. “That’s how we create a Jewish community of meaning,” he said.

To take the JGN survey, visit www.grandparents.2.vu/1. JGN also maintains an active Facebook page, ww.facebook.com/groups/JewishGrandparentsNetwork.

Source: “Are Jewish Grandparents a Forgotten Population?,” Atlanta Jewish Times, Logan C. Ritchie, November 7, 2018

CJP Boston Jewish Teen Education & Engagement Initiative Evaluation

The Greater Boston Jewish Teen Education and Engagement Initiative (the Initiative), launched in January of
2014 by Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston (CJP) and the Jim Joseph Foundation, aims to enhance Jewish teen lives in the Greater Boston area. This report provides an overview of key evaluation findings and considerations from data collected in Phase III of the Initiative’s evaluation. The evaluation used a mixed methods approach, including surveys with two key informant groups and interviews with members of three additional groups.

CJP Boston Jewish Teen Education & Engagement Initiative Evaluation, Phase 3 Report: 2017-2018, October 2018

 

Jewish Teen Education and Engagement Funder Collaborative

Teens today are impacted by monumental sociological forces and challenges. With this understanding, and powered by research and data, the Jewish Teen Education and Engagement Funder Collaborative develops, nurtures, and scales innovative new approaches to teen engagement. In this unprecedented collaboration of national and local funders, ten participating communities are united by a paradigm shift in the approach to this work that demands that teen educators and leaders now ask, “how can our work help this teen thrive as a human being in today’s complex and challenging world?”

The Funder Collaborative and its communities look to answer this question every day. They come together—virtually and in person—to share lessons learned with each other and to identify the most relevant lessons to share with others. Recently, 20 implementers and professional development professionals came together in Austin, TX for three days. They wanted to learn directly from that dynamic city, a hotbed of creativity and entrepreneurship. Participants had a private workshop with the founder of Storybar to learn what makes a great story and to learn how they can integrate storytelling into their work. The Collaborative also met with Shalom Austin to hear about Jewish life in Austin and to share highlights about the experiences of the ten communities, so that their learnings go beyond the Collaborative.

What I value most about the Implementer Convening’s is the opportunity to network with my fellow Implementers. The relationships, both personal and professional, we are forming because of the opportunities we are given to get together are crucial to the success of our work, in my opinion. Because of the convenings we are more than a group of implementers we are a community.  No matter the location, our time together always inspires and motivates me to take our learnings and try new strategies in San Diego. Out of all the learnings I took away from Austin, I am most excited to experiment with influencers and campaigns to drive traction and awareness to the awesome work we are doing!
– Rebecka Handler, Director of the San Diego Jewish Teen Initiative

While the communities each have unique characteristics and singular elements of their engagement efforts, certain trends are prevalent across all the initiatives and highlight their important work:

  1. Communities put teens in the driver’s seat of their own experiences because today’s teens are comfortable finding and using their voice to make change. Funder Collaborative community initiatives enable teens to architect their own journeys in a variety ways: by creating programming for their peers, in reaching out to their friends to make sure they’re aware of opportunities, and even making decisions about major grants for teen programming.
  2. Discovery is a critical part of engagement. Teens, parents and even Jewish professionals say it’s difficult to find out about local Jewish opportunities. By developing online portals and searchable digital databases, the communities are amplifying the marketing power of all local organizations who post their events, and creating genuine value for the community.
  3. Success means building and nurturing an ecosystem. The Funder Collaborative communities see first-hand that a dynamic ecosystem surrounds the teens themselves: community partners, supervisors, lay leaders, professionals and parents all directly and indirectly impact teen engagement. Especially in their the early teen years, parents require targeted marketing and outreach. Critically, the teen initiatives recognize that parents themselves often seek a supportive community to support their parenting, and many of the initiatives now offer workshops and community-building activities for parents.
  4. Creating lasting change requires skilled and capable educators. After uniting around a new paradigm of teen-centric engagement, the initiatives quickly understood that developing a cadre of knowledgeable and capable educators and youth professionals would be critical to achieving their desired outcomes.
  5. Wellness is fundamental to achieving positive outcomes for teens. Focusing on the whole teen, including their mental health and overall wellness, is emerging as foundational to effective Jewish teen education and engagement. Several communities offer workshops or conferences on adolescent development and family systems, deeper understanding of the social forces impacting teens today, and specialized training for educators in youth mental health first aid. By addressing and elevating teen wellness, Funder Collaborative communities are pioneering a new, holistic view of engagement work, with healthy, balanced and resilient teens at the center.

More than five years ago, the ten communities and funders came together to co-invest in teen engagement efforts that would be informed by up-to-the-minute research and data. As the initiatives evolve and continue to be informed by learnings, the landscape of teen engagement continues to grow—and the outcomes are increasingly positive.

Want to learn how your community can get involved? Contact Sara Allen, Collaborative Director, [email protected].

The Jim Joseph Foundation is one of many funders invested in the Collaborative. 

New CASJE Project to Study the Career Development of Educators in Jewish Institutions of Teaching and Learning

William Davidson Foundation and Jim Joseph Foundation Award $1.5 million to Support Large-Scale and Timely Research Program

Washington, DC – CASJE (The Consortium for Applied Studies in Jewish Education) today announced the launch of a major project supported by the William Davidson Foundation and the Jim Joseph Foundation for comprehensive research on the pipeline and “career arc” of educators working in Jewish education. The two-year project is supported by generous grants totaling $1.5 million from both foundations, and will yield findings to be shared broadly with the field of Jewish education and engagement.

“We are embarking on a timely project that promises to yield new key findings and data on critical issues that affect the work of educators in Jewish institutions and the needs of the field,” says Michael Feuer, CASJE co-chair and Dean of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development at The George Washington University, home of CASJE.

Rabbi Mitchel Malkus, CASJE co-chair and Head of the Charles E. Smith Jewish Day School, adds that “The support of the William Davidson Foundation and Jim Joseph Foundation enables CASJE to conduct this project on a national scale and to gather and analyze data about educators, where they work, and the professional preparation they receive. This data will be of significant value to the places at which these educators work. Moreover, we hope to help the field understand the needs of educators to recruit and retain the most talented people.”

Earlier this year, the William Davidson Foundation supported a CASJE-facilitated “Problem Formulation Convening” (PFC) with a group of educators and researchers, which generated high-priority research questions. The group identified challenges relating to the professional culture in many segments of the Jewish education sector, opportunities for advancement, and the condition of educator compensation. The PFC helped identify the three questions central to CASJE’s new project: 1) Entry: What does it take to launch a career in Jewish education? 2) On the Journey: Why do educators stay in this field and how do they grow? And 3) Mapping the Marketplace: Where are personnel shortages and saturation?

“Our founder, William Davidson, understood the lifelong impact Jewish education can have on an individual and a community,” says Menachem “Manny” Menchel, program officer for Jewish Education at the William Davidson Foundation. “Mr. Davidson supported various causes for many decades, including those that benefited individual Jewish day schools and communities, as well as larger opportunities to professionalize the field of Jewish education. This grant – to understand how to attract and retain the best educators – positions us to expand upon his vision.”

The research will be overseen by CASJE and will be conducted initially by Rosov Consulting in three linked studies. First, researchers will study the career plans of people currently in the settings from which Jewish educators have tended to come, such as summer camps, longer-term programs in Israel, and college fellowships. The second study will involve a comprehensive mapping of those who work in the field of Jewish education today to understand why they stay in the field and how they grow. The third component will focus on problems faced by employers and training providers coping with personnel shortages and/or saturation.

“CASJE’s unique approach combines planning strategies and research programs that reveal insights through systematic and applied research,” says Stacie Cherner, Senior Program Officer at the Jim Joseph Foundation. “Moreover, with organizations such as Leading Edge and JPRO already doing important work in many of these research areas, CASJE is positioned to deliver much-needed comprehensive quantitative and qualitative findings. Together, stakeholders in the field can then review this work to make sense of people’s experiences and choices at different stages of their careers.”

CASJE is a community of researchers, practitioners, and philanthropic leaders committed to sharing knowledge to improve Jewish education. In addition to the William Davidson Foundation and Jim Joseph Foundation, CASJE receives support from The AVI CHAI Foundation and The Crown Family, among others. The George Washington University serves as the administrative home for CASJE, enabling the specific goals of CASJE to be enriched by the academic and intellectual resources of a global, comprehensive, research university.  Along with this new project, CASJE’s areas of inquiry include Jewish educational leadership, Jewish early childhood education, Hebrew language education, and Israel education.

CASJE’s Board of Directors includes co-chairs Dr. Michael Feuer and Rabbi Mitchel Malkus, and members Dr. Charles “Chip” Edelsberg, Dr. Rena Dorph (UC Berkeley), Dr. Sharon Feiman-Nemser (Brandeis University), Dr. Ellen Goldring (Vanderbilt University), Dr. Paul Goren (Superintendent of Evanston/Skokie School District 65), Ilana Horwitz (Stanford University), Dr. Benjamin Jacobs (The George Washington University), Dr. Jon Levisohn (Brandeis University), Robert Sherman (The Jewish Education Project), and Dr. Lee Shulman (Stanford University).

Source: Jeducation World

Why it is Helpful to Hear your Challenges are not Unique

There was something a little uncanny about my last trip to Chicago.

Let me explain: I’ve spent much of the last eight years planning and executing residential education programs as the Academic Director of the Yiddish Book Center. In these programs, different sorts of participants—high school students, college students, writers, media professionals, and, most recently, through a grant from the Jim Joseph Foundation, high school and middle school teachers—gather at the Center to learn Yiddish, study modern Jewish literature, and connect with one another.

Overseeing and teaching in dozens of these programs over the years, for more than eight hundred participants, I’ve figured out a lot about what makes them work.

So, what was unusual about my trip in August for a Jim Joseph Foundation gathering was not just that, for a change, I was in the role of participant rather than organizer (that happens, from time to time), but that all the other participants, themselves directors of Jewish professional development programs of one sort or another, have similar experiences to me. It’s funny to do an icebreaker when you know that all the people doing it are, like you, people whose job it is to lead icebreakers.

That, of course, was what ultimately made the gathering meaningful. As different as our organizations and programs are, so many of the issues we face on a regular basis are uncannily similar. All of us are trying, in one way or another, to educate Jewish educators. Both in the substance of what it means to do that—how do you help an educator to do their job more effectively?—and in the methods we use to accomplish our goals (retreats, seminars, websites, and so on), we found a whole lot to discuss and debate.

Rosov Consulting, which facilitated the convening, created many different kinds of opportunities for us to share challenges and experiences, and to brainstorm and be creative. One moment stands out to me in this regard in particular. I casually spoke with a couple of the other participants about an aspect of our work I always find challenging: connecting with program participants virtually, after a workshop or retreat has ended.

As we talked about this, someone raised the idea of holding regular e-conferences, using platforms like Zoom, GoToMeeting, or Google Hangouts. One of the participants responded emphatically: “Those really don’t work for us. No matter how we do them, and even if the technology cooperates, it’s just never really satisfying.”

That was important for me to hear because I also feel those platforms don’t fully work for the Yiddish Book Center’s programs either. I’ve always wondered why we don’t see stronger results when we try to use those with our participants. Were we doing something wrong, choosing the wrong platform, or not approaching an e-conference in the right way? Why was it that in-person gatherings were always so much more intense and meaningful, in so many of our programs? It’s certainly possible that we can still find ways to make this kind of post-program virtual meeting work for us; but it was, frankly, a relief for me to hear that it’s not just us who find that modality mostly lackluster. I began to feel less anxious about trying to make that particular approach to alumni engagement work, and it inspired me to put more energy into exploring other methods for connecting with our participants once they’re home.

And, of course, one of the most useful outcomes of this Chicago gathering was that I now have a diverse and enthusiastic group of program directors to whom I can turn with questions about what works for them, and what doesn’t.  This is exactly the type of community that will help support me as I pursue my goals and look to advance our alumni engagement in new and meaningful ways.

Josh Lambert is Academic Director at the Yiddish Book Center