A New Road Map for the Foundation

The following letter introduced the Foundation’s new Road Map in the October 2019 edition of its newsletter, A Closer Look.

More than two years ago, the Foundation began a major process to examine our grantmaking strategies and desired outcomes. With that process complete, we are pleased to share a new Road Map detailing how the Foundation approaches and supports effective Jewish learning experiences that are meaningful and helpful to people throughout different inflection points in their lives. We invite you to view the Road Map in Talmud Daf format, which includes core assumptions, principles, long-term outcomes, and accompanying commentary. You’ll also see our new Logic Models that detail each strategic priority.

The Foundation’s mission—to foster compelling, effective Jewish learning experiences for young Jews—remains unchanged, as laser-focused as before. Yet, we recognize the need to take more risks, to identify more ways and places in which learning occurs, and to both lead and collaborate more to pursue this mission in today’s world. The Road Map shares a new aspiration, indicative of Jim Joseph’s, z”l, belief that Jewish learning can significantly influence a person’s whole self and her or his place in society. We want the Foundation’s philanthropic efforts in Jewish learning to inspire all Jews, their families, and their friends to lead connected, meaningful, and purpose-filled lives. Jewish learning should inspire them to make contributions to their communities and beyond.

We hope these new materials on the Foundation’s strategic approach are helpful to you and articulate how we approach our work today. Please let us know any questions and feedback you have.

The More Things Change: Returning to Our Field After Five Years

As we enter 5780, it is a time to take stock of what we have been in the past and what we choose to bring into the future.  I find myself in an interesting and unique role, returning to a team at the Jim Joseph Foundation that I was a part of five years ago. Over the last two months I’ve re-settled into my role here. And I wonder: what of me has changed, what about the roles and fields of Jewish philanthropy/education/engagement has changed, what do I want to hold onto from first time at the Foundation, and where am I eager to grow beyond the limits I had previously set for myself?

For the past four and half years, I served as CEO of Youth Leadership Institute (YLI). I gained new perspective both about the work of a foundation professional and a profound expanded empathy for those who lead nonprofits. While one can study about leading an organization, holding true to a vision and workplan while also needing to meet payroll and manage HR issues—all in an unpredictable and tension-filled world—was critical experiential learning that has informed my leadership and view of the unique roles we each play in our sector.

I deepened my appreciation for the power of support systems and of social networks comprised of people working toward similar visions and goals. I would not have helped YLI achieve the successes we had during my time there without the network of professionals I could reach out to with questions, challenges, and other issues I faced nearly daily. Importantly, some of the most influential and helpful people in my network included partners who invested in the work that our young people led every day. Because of this experience, I am especially excited to stand side-by-side with the grantee-partners with whom I am privileged to work and to be present as a thought partner and mentor. I can now connect them to resources that informed and inspired my own growth as a leader beyond my previous relational work in grantmaking.

In the past few months since returning to the Foundation and focusing on Jewish education, engagement, and leadership development, I have observed a marked and positive development: the seamless inclusion of the voices of a next generation of leaders. As just one example, the initial plenary of the JPRO conference allowed our field to celebrate the work, vision, and passion of Kate Belza O’Bannon and Arya Marvazy, co-recipients of the Young Professional Award.  They spoke proudly about how critical their personal narratives and identities are to unlocking the potential of Judaism as a component of leading a connected, meaningful, and purposeful life.  The authenticity they presented was in reflection of our community’s ancient wisdom (presented through a study session by Rabba Yaffa Epstein) as she challenged all of us present to think about the nuances of leading by example and living our values.

I also have been deeply appreciative of the eagerness of my colleagues from foundations across North America to reconnect and serve as partners working toward effective grantmaking and culture change in the Jewish organizational world.  Moreover, I notice a significant increase from five years ago in professional foundation staff and new foundations in general. Perhaps this observation also is a reflection of a more organized, networked field made up of more people who want to engage with and learn from each other. Whether due to an increase in professionals or an increase in engaged professionals—or both—this is a welcome development. These people are entrusted by their foundations’ leadership to carry out their respective missions and visions, and they are doing it with integrity.

This growth of the field is in part a testament to the generation of leaders who I learned from five years ago as the Foundation seeded various programs and cohorts.  And I am particularly delighted that many of these emerging leaders speak less about Jewish survival for survival’s sake as a people, and more about building inclusive environments where Jewish people and their peers can find connection, meaning, and purpose.

Surely this work building inclusive environment has always occurred to varying degrees, and we need to give credit to those who pushed the issues before they were in fashion. These efforts required emotional labor and were often left to those who were least proximate to power. These people were courageous in pushing for basic acknowledgement of their lived experiences and an equal space in our communal conversations, let alone equity, from a field predominantly populated by leaders who were white, male, able bodied, Ashkenormative, cis gendered, straight, and of class privilege, to name a not all-encompassing list. Because of the work of the individuals, communities, and organizations least proximate to power, I notice a significant evolution from five years ago in how the field looks to engage and talk with Jews of Color and non-Ashkenormative members of the Sephardi and Mizrahi communities. Engaging these communities is now seen by many in our field as critical to building a thriving, larger Jewish community. In addition, our field speaks more openly about the need to change workplace culture—with the #MeToo movement top of mind—to ensure we are a field in which people are treated respectfully, are heard, and want to continue to work.

With all of this, I am excited to bring a new version of myself to 5780—one that stands on the shoulders of those who came before and who sees my work as interwoven with my colleagues in new and influential ways.

Jon Marker is a Senior Program Officer at the Jim Joseph Foundation.

Onward Israel

Each summer, thousands of North American college-age students experience daily life in Israel—and what it takes to succeed there professionally—through Onward Israel’s two-month professional internship in Israel. More than 12,000 young adults have participated in Onward since 2012, attracted in part to the program’s accessible length and affordable price, making it one of the fastest-growing and impactful programs in the Jewish world.

My summer on Hillel Onward Israel Jerusalem was without a doubt one of the most incredible summers of my life…It was really amazing to have gone on a program that gives its participants the freedom to explore Israel as they wish. I interned at the Hebrew University Givat Ram in the Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Department…Even today I am still in touch with the professor I worked with, as we are continuing our work together over email. Onward Israel Jerusalem intensified my passion for the land of Israel, gave me valuable research experience to take back to Cornell, and allowed me to personally connect with the land I consider to be my home.
– Emily, Hillel Onward Israel Jerusalem, summer 2017

Israel’s vibrant economy, thriving technology and innovation sectors, and multi-cultural landscape make it an ideal place for college-age students looking to have a resume-enhancing experience that builds life-skills and can help them when they enter the workforce. Because they are immersed in the Israeli workplace and society—they are placed in housing and have opportunities to tour the country—participants return home with greater knowledge, sense of connection, and engagement in Jewish life and Israel. Evaluations of participants before and after the program show that they increase their knowledge about diversity and variety in Israeli life, society, and politics; their sense of responsibility and connection to Israelis and the Jewish people; the ability to explain to others why being Jewish and engaging with Israel are important; and knowledge of Judaism, Jewish communities, and the diversity of approaches to Judaism.

So far, I have come to the conclusion that Israel is everything Alaska is not! Unlike in my hometown, here, in Jerusalem I am bombarded with the sound of traffic the minute I walk out my front door. The food, the sights, the music, and especially the environment are very different from anything I grew up with. Being in Jerusalem and working in the museum has given me a stronger understanding of the history of Israel, which means a greater appreciation of the ground I stand on today. I am here in Jerusalem basking in all the glory of my people’s hard work and could not feel more fortunate and more welcomed.
– Aidan, Onward Israel Arts and Culture, summer 2018

Importantly, research shows that these changes in participants continue for years after they return home. Other key findings from Onward Israel’s numerous evaluations, conducted by Rosov Consulting, show that:

  • Internships and the framework for personal growth attracts young people with the potential to deepen their connection to Jewish life. More than 75% of participants have spent less than three months in Israel prior to the program. More than 90% of participants define themselves as Conservative, Reform, or Just Jewish.
  • Participants are overwhelmingly satisfied with their internship and 90% of employers recommend to their peers to absorb interns.
  • Alumni make plans to return to Israel and become more involved with Jewish and Israel activities back on their college campuses (Onward Israel is particularly attractive for Birthright Israel alumni who want to return to Israel).
  • Onward Israel’s partnership model with Israeli businesses and organizations gives participants a customized experience and enables partners to achieve their own objectives.

I think Onward gave me a push to bring people together and explain more about Israel in a way where I could use my knowledge. I was a lot more informed. Maybe before, I could have also done it, but it gave me more confidence.
– Onward alumnus

Engaging in day-to-day life in Israel with all of its complexities and challenges gives participants an appreciation of the country and realistic and sophisticated understanding of both Israel and Jewish life. Building on this proven model, Onward is poised to engage even more young adults. It aspires to reach 5,000 annual participants by 2023 and to help bring half of all young adults who experience Israel before college or through Birthright Israel back to Israel for a second, more intensive experience. These participants, like their predecessors, will return home more connected, engaged, and inspired to become involved in Jewish life and Israel experience on campus and within their Jewish communities.

The Jim Joseph Foundation is a supporter of Onward Israel. To learn more about Onward Israel please visit www.onwardisrael.org.

Take an Inside Look at CEO Transitions in Major Jewish Organizations

The nonprofit world is in the midst of several simultaneous seismic shifts, three of which are the current massive intergenerational transfer of wealth, the push for gender equality and the large number of impending leadership transitions. C-suite changes are times during which organizations often struggle to find effective ways to find the proper balance between their sense of loss on one hand and, on the other, their desire to capitalize on the opportunity to clarify their vision and/or reinvigorate their sense of purpose.

In an effort to pull back the curtain on the many challenges posed by leadership transitions, Leading Edge recently commissioned a series of case studies profiling CEO transitions at six different major Jewish organizations across the country: American Jewish World Service, Bend the Arc, Combined Jewish Philanthropies, a JCC in the Midwest, Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership, and Tufts Hillel. What we learned were valuable lessons about how Jewish organizations can best prepare and position leaders to succeed.

These case studies offer a candid, personal look at the inner workings of a CEO transition process. They are rich with first person accounts from key figures involved – the outgoing and incoming CEOs, board members, search committee members, and others – and address key issues for Jewish organizations today, including gender and generational differences in approach to leadership, organizational culture change, best practices for search committees, and more.

We are sharing these stories now because we are living in a time of great opportunity and great risk for the entire sector. It is critical that each of us do our part to help as many organizations as possible navigate their succession challenges in a way that strengthens their management teams and positions them to thrive in the months and years ahead. The leaders chosen today will set the direction for their organizations and the entire field for years to come; the social fabric of our society will be in their hands.

In the case studies series, three stories highlight internal candidates who were selected as the new CEO and three highlight stories of external candidates who were selected. But they all reflect and articulate the deep level of intentionality, thoughtfulness, and purpose with which the board and search committee approached the process.

The learnings come through in clear, sometimes surprising ways, and can inform other organizations’ approaches to leadership and leadership transitions.

As one example, the case study on Bend the Arc’s transition captures a “breakthrough” moment for new CEO Stosh Cotler. “…a breakthrough came when she spoke with a male CEO who was moving to a larger organization that required experience handling real estate finances, an area of expertise that he didn’t have. Cotler asked him about whether that worried him. He replied, ‘I’ll learn.’

“I realized I didn’t think this way. But there’s no reason that I shouldn’t have the same optimistic view of my ability to learn and grow,” [Cotler] says.

The case study on American Jewish World Service chronicles the give-and-take, and even tension, that can occur between an outgoing CEO and an organization’s board, in this instance led then by Kathleen Levin: “‘Ruth couldn’t understand why we couldn’t just blindly accept her choice [of successor], but from a governance perspective, you really need to be careful,’” Levin says. ‘[The selection] can’t be done by one or two board members, it can’t be done by the outgoing CEO. It has to be done by the full board, and every board member has to buy-in, has to feel heard, and has to have the time to deliberate,’ she says.”

These quotes are indicative of the honesty and vulnerability with which the featured organizations approached the process of being interviewed for these case studies.

When Leading Edge was founded in 2014, many organizations that comprise the Jewish nonprofit sector were on the precipice of a long-predicted, generational leadership transition. Five years later, that very transition is happening. Major Jewish organizations recently completed CEO searches, while others are about to embark on theirs.

Last year, Leading Edge released a CEO Search Committee Guide with best practices for CEO searches and applied them to the Jewish nonprofit sector. Now, we build on that with these fascinating and unique stories of leadership transitions.

The case studies, prepared by Eben Harrell, a senior editor at Harvard Business Review (HBR), are available in both written and audio form at https://leadingedge.org/case-study/. We hope you take time to review them, appreciate the transparency provided by all involved, and gain deeper knowledge about the many elements of effective leadership transitions.

Sandy Cardin is the Chair of Leading Edge, and Gali Cooks is the President and CEO of the organization. It works to influence, inspire, and enables dramatic change in attracting, developing, and retaining top talent for Jewish organizations by creating a forum for the sector to address talent and culture issues. The case study series was funded by the Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation and the Jim Joseph Foundation.

Raising Up Overhead: How We Can Do Better

Recently, five of the wealthiest foundations in America announced that they will do more to help their grantees cover overhead expenses.

This commitment reflects an essential best practice in philanthropy: ensuring grantees have the unrestricted capital they need to achieve their missions, sustain healthy organizations and grow their impact. This practice stems from the business world where investors know that great outcomes require both risk and risk capital.

And yet, the Jewish sector seems to be hesitating in adopting this approach. At a time when organizations are eager to dream big, tackle community challenges and strengthen their operations, many funders continue to direct their grants to a narrow set of programmatic goals. And all too often, these grants do not cover the true cost of the work.

But the announcement by the five foundations creates a moment of opportunity for funders in the Jewish sector to follow suit. Together with Bridgespan, the foundations put forth a menu of different grantmaking approaches for covering overhead expenses, as well as the indirect costs required to operate specific programs. At each of our foundations, we already see how effective both unrestricted multiyear support and funding essential operating costs are in driving and sustaining progress.

In our experience, general operating support is viewed by grantees as a statement – and source – of trust. When we offer grantees the runway and autonomy they need to invest in their staff, operations and ideas, we send a clear message that we believe in them. We trust and encourage them to think long-term and to execute a strategy that will best achieve programmatic goals and advance our shared missions. We know they need to be healthy, resilient and able to take risks in order to be effective.

In turn, allowing grantees more freedom to achieve their core mission tends to bring us closer. The more confidence we place in an organization and its leadership, the stronger and more productive our relationship becomes. By alleviating the pressure on specific short-term costs and outcomes, we lessen some of the power imbalances inherent in the funder-grantee dynamic. Grantees feel more comfortable speaking openly with us about their vision for greater long-term impact – and the challenges they foresee along the way. With this approach to funding, we begin to rely on each other as partners in pursuit of a common vision.

Now more than ever, the Jewish philanthropic community expects organizations to look at a complex, evolving world and respond with speed and creativity. We ask our partners and their leaders to perform at a high level in a challenging environment, and we must ensure they have the resources that enable them to be nimble and take risks. We have found that we can best support this agility by standing behind our grantees and not in front of them. The challenges our community faces require us as funders to look to the experts who lead our partner organizations, who know their constituencies best, and who are on the ground planning, doing and evaluating.

Of course, providing unrestricted grants and overhead funding are not substitutes for other best practices. The more that foundations commit toward general operating support, the more important honest communication and strategic alignment between funder and grantee become. Our role as funders includes working with grantees to help ensure they are financially resilient and operating in the most efficient way possible. At the same time, grantees must be open with us about the true costs of their programs and the resources needed to achieve their goals.

Importantly, unrestricted funding is not about ignoring outcomes. Funders certainly should care about the success metrics of particular programs. We believe, however, that when grantees are able to appropriate their own programmatic funds, or at least cover both the administrative and direct costs of running their programs, they are more likely to make necessary adjustments along the way. Our sector will be stronger when we embrace the idea that investing in an organization’s ability to learn, grow and compete is directly tied to its ability to achieve impact.

To be clear, we do at times make restricted grants because we know their value in piloting new approaches and supporting specific efforts that drive toward new outcomes. But in making restricted grants, it is vital that funders work with grantees to assess accurately – and then support – the full direct and indirect costs of operating a project.

Regardless of a funder’s grantmaking strategy, the true price of an organization’s work is always the same: the sum of programmatic, administrative and overhead costs. We know it is possible for nonprofits to deliver results on malnourished and even starving overhead budgets. But our work as funders is not about seeing what comes from a shoestring. Our work is about leveraging our resources to help grantees positively influence people and create the most possible good in the world.

At a time when the Jewish community is hungry for change, let’s ensure that organizations can attract and retain talented professionals. Let’s ensure they can be healthy, resilient and able to integrate the best tools and technology into their work. Let’s ensure they can cover the real cost of their mission-driven work. Let’s ensure they feel empowered to try, fail, learn and succeed in their quest to shape a vibrant Jewish future.

After all, as BBYO’s Matt Grossman puts it, “the most effective way to inspire innovation and bring to life new initiatives is through an ecosystem of healthy, well-funded organizations that are encouraged to dream together with their philanthropic partners.”

Lisa Eisen is President of the U.S. Jewish Portfolio of the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation. Barry Finestone is President and CEO of the Jim Joseph Foundation.

originally published in eJewish Philanthropy 

During the Jewish High Holidays, there’s a growing awareness that not all U.S. Jews are white

Rabbi Joseph Berman’s sermon for the Jewish High Holidays, which begin Sunday at sunset, highlights a core ethos of this new synagogue in Northwest Washington — Jews aren’t just white people from Europe.

“I’m going to talk about how we are and always have been an ‘Erev Rav,’ ” Berman said this week, using a term from Exodus defined as the “mixed multitude” of people who fled biblical Egypt with the Israelites.

The message will resonate with members of his New Synagogue Project, which is one of an increasing number of U.S. Jewish organizations that are challenging the modern American image of Jews as Jerry Seinfeld-ian (or Sarah Silverman-ish) and bringing much more visibility and voice to Jews whose roots are African American, Middle Eastern, Asian and everything in between. The trend has opened conversations on racism, equity of power in the Jewish community, conversion and what it means to be “really Jewish.”

“There’s this problematic narrative, that Jews of color are new to the community because they’re converts or part of mixed marriages, and that’s not true,” Berman said. “For some Jews of color, that’s part of their story, but there have always been Jews of color. It’s where Judaism started.”

Groups and projects have been popping up increasingly around the country in the last couple years. Community leaders say the rising national conversation about racism has prompted a more intense confronting of how it plays out among white Jews. Jews of color in 2019 are also more comfortable challenging racism and institutional underrepresentation.

There are new synagogues like Berman’s, which began last year in Petworth; new affinity groups within synagogues for Jews of color like the Kehilah Multiracial Engagement Project at the large Conservative synagogue Adas Israel; and new national groups like the California-based Jews of Color Field Building Initiative, which gives grants to efforts that are “intentionally developing/nurturing environments in which multiracial Jewish community can thrive,” according to its website. Their first year, they gave out $200,000.

Sunday night begins Rosh Hashanah, the start of the Jewish calendar and an intense 10-day sacred period called the High Holy Days, or “Yamim Noraim,” or Days of Awe. The period, which ends with Yom Kippur on Oct. 9, calls Jews to self-reflect, to turn to God, to repent, soul-search, forgive, move on with gratitude. It’s among the most observed rituals for U.S. Jews, and the most likely time for them to come to synagogue (about 40 percent of Jews almost never, or never, go to synagogue, according to Pew Research. Another 35 percent attend sporadically for the High Holidays or other services).

The increased institutional attention to Jews of color during this time is taking different forms. For some, it’s meant weaving personal and societal confessions for racism into the Yom Kippur confessional prayer, called Ashamnu, adding mass incarceration, police violence and racially unequal access to housing. With a spike in reported anti-Semitic hate crimes, U.S. Jewish institutions have been pouring more money into security, which often means uniformed police and visible firearms. Leaders of several institutions said they were thinking hard this year, with bigger crowds, at what security should look like in a diverse community.

A phalanx of police conducting security checks “is definitely a turnoff for folks of color,” said Emma Rafaelof, 24, an international affairs policy analyst who is ethnically Chinese and was adopted by a Mom who is Ashkenazi (or Eastern European) and a father from Iran. She grew up in Colorado. “Some may not want to come to services because they don’t want to get into a situation where they’re facing law enforcement.”

Rafaelof is a team leader of the Jews of color group at Berman’s Project. The group is called ­POCISM — People of Color, Indigenous people and Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews, the latter two terms referencing Jews with roots in the East, North Africa, or Spanish-speaking places. The group is keeping these issues in mind as they plan security this year.

Estimates of the number of Jews of color vary. A Washington Post analysis of General Social Survey Data found that in this decade, 89 percent of U.S. Jews are white, down from 99 percent in the 1970s. The reason for the increase in Jews of color isn’t clear, but it’s happening as the country overall is diversifying. About one-third of married Jews have a spouse who is not Jewish, Pew Research found.

While Jews in the United States have for centuries been considered legally “white,” they weren’t until recent decades considered culturally part of the social mainstream — living largely in enclave and banned in some places from getting jobs, spots in universities, slots at clubs or houses in certain neighborhoods. Jews have a hugely wide range of views about what makes someone “Jewish” — whether it’s culture, theology, practice, birth, or a mix. Because of immigration peaks in the last century or so, many American Jews have roots in Eastern Europe, and are ethnically Ashkenazi.

The new movement to look at what some call “Ashke-normification” challenges assumptions about what it means to look like and be Jewish.

There was never one answer in Judaism, and it’s only getting more complex.

Under Jewish law, Jewish status is defined by whether one’s birth mother is Jewish. Much of institutional U.S. Judaism has broadened, including people as Jews if their fathers are Jewish or if they’ve converted in a process recognized by one’s community. This is not a small issue in more orthodox communities, and in Israel, where state rabbis in recent years have been tightening the restrictions on which conversions they will accept.

From an official point of view, one cannot simply state that they accept Judaism and be recognized formally as a Jew, even in the more progressive parts of institutional Judaism. At the same time, much of institutional U.S. Judaism has been rapidly opening up to interfaith families and the inclusion of people exploring Judaism but who have not converted.

So the question of one’s heritage isn’t trivial in Judaism. However, to see these questions of legitimacy raised in otherwise liberal Jewish communities, where standards are fluid on everything from keeping the Sabbath to belief in God, to some smacks of simple racism.

Jews of color interviewed for this piece described entering Jewish spaces and being asked, essentially: Why are you here? Even if it’s well-intentioned, Jews of color say, being asked if you’re married to a Jewish person or converted is part of an “othering” that can push people out.

“How can Jews of color be totally engaged if they’re profiled on their way to synagogue?” said Ilana Kaufman, executive director of the Field Building Initiative. “Jews of color are asked: Who do they know here? What’s the rabbi’s name? Someone using the facilities might be asked if they’re janitorial staff.” She said she believes there is some American Jewish anxiety around the topic of nonwhite Jews that’s not unlike American anxiety and racism about national demographic shifts.

“They worry about diluting Jewishness, that people of color celebrating their Jewish identity will eclipse our ‘Jewishness.’ It’s like we’re dealing with a finite pie,” she said.

New efforts are focusing on racial sensitivity training for clergy and community leaders, leadership pathways for people of color and the inclusion of Jewish role models of color.

Carla Mays, 39, a San Francisco planner and research analyst, is a board member of the Jewish Multiracial Network. Founded in the 1990s by parents working to support multiracial Jewish families, the Network is one of the older groups working on advocating for Jews of color.

Mays says she has limited patience with conversations that are limited to sensitizing language. She wants to see Jews of color have a fair crack at grants and leadership positions.

“We want inclusion, not to talk about difference,” she said this week. Mays, who is African American, traces her Jewish roots to her great-grandmother, who considered Judaism part of her religious identity. Growing up in Los Angeles, she saw how her mother and grandmother considered Judaism a core part of who they were and their heritage, but did not feel welcome in institutional Jewish life. Mays said she felt torn once she moved to San Francisco as she tried to balance between Jewish and African American spaces.

“I couldn’t worship in peace, and was constantly questioned about who I was. And I saw [young Jews of color] having to bear that brunt. . . . That’s why I stepped into this role,” she said of her work in the Network.

Andrew Esensten has been studying and writing about Jews of color in the U.S. and Israel for a decade. He calls today “the most exciting time since then, because race and how it plays out in the Jewish community is finally being taken seriously.” He studies everyone from Andy Cheng, a Chinese American convert who just became president of a major Palo Alto synagogue, to the Hebrew Israelites, a diverse group of people of color who believe they, not white people, are descendants of ancient Israel.

Right now, he says, the focus of these new efforts is simple: Raising awareness about the diversity of Jewish people that has always been there.

“That’s surprisingly harder than it might seem.”

Source: “During the Jewish High Holidays, there’s a growing awareness that not all U.S. Jews are white,” September 28, 2019, Washington Post

Study Underway to Address the Recruitment, Retention, and Development of Educators in Jewish Settings in North America

CASJE-supported research will focus on career trajectories of Jewish educators in eight cities

A multi-year, comprehensive research project addressing the recruitment, retention, and development of educators working in Jewish settings in North America is underway, led by CASJE (Consortium for Applied Studies in Jewish Education) and conducted by Rosov Consulting. The research program consists of three main components that examine the career trajectories and experiences of Jewish educators from multiple vantage points.  On the Journey (OTJ), the first phase of this study, focuses on the career trajectories and lived experiences of educators employed in the field. The research will build on a Working Paper authored by Rosov Consulting that was released earlier this year from CASJE and The George Washington University Graduate School of Education and Human Development (GSEHD). The new study will explore eight yet-to-be-selected communities representing diversity of Jewish population size, geographic region, and Jewish educational infrastructure.

Over the next 18-20 months, OTJ will investigate 1) Jewish educators, 2) the settings and sectors in which they work, 3) the kinds of professional development and other supports available to them (and whether they have taken advantage of these opportunities), and 4) how these interventions contribute to key outcomes that have implications for professional performance: job retention (length of tenure and career commitment), job satisfaction, and a sense of professional self-efficacy.

In parallel with  OTJ, the research project will continue with two additional phases: Preparing for Entry, which will study the career plans of people in the settings from which Jewish educators have tended to come (such as summer camps, longer-term programs in Israel, and college fellowships) to determine the factors that contribute to recruitment into the field; and Mapping the Market (MTM), which will focus on identifying available pre-service training and in-service professional development offerings for Jewish educators, as well as challenges faced by employers and training providers who are coping with personnel shortages and/or saturation.

“Since the overall research program will synthesize data from all three of its strands, the research has the potential to dramatically amplify the field’s understandings of the whole cycle of the recruitment, retention, and development of Jewish educators across multiple sectors,” says Arielle Levites, Managing Director of CASJE.

In order to build on prior studies of Jewish education professionals, the research takes a broad approach in defining who is a “Jewish educator.” Thus, researchers will include a spectrum of professionals involved in designing and delivering experiences for Jewish learning, engagement, connection, and meaning.

“Jewish education policy makers, professional development providers, pre-service training providers, philanthropists and others all stand to benefit from what we learn during this study,” adds Wendy Rosov, Founder and Principal of Rosov Consulting. “We are excited to make a significant contribution to a growing knowledge-base about who Jewish educators are in the U.S. today, how and why they enter into the field (and why some that we might expect to enter don’t), how their careers progress, the market demand for their services, and more.”

OTJ in particular will study professionals who work directly with people of any age who identify as Jews, in settings—whether virtual, brick-and-mortar, or outdoor—that aim to help participants find special meaning in Jewish texts, experiences, and associations.

This includes five primary sectors within which these professionals work: 1) formal Jewish education (day schools, early childhood education centers, supplementary schools); 2) informal/experiential settings including both immersive (e.g., camp) and non-immersive (e.g., youth organizations, JCCs); 3) those involved in engagement, social justice, and innovation; 4) communal organizations that may employ someone in an educational role (e.g., scholars in residence at Federations or Jewish educators at Jewish Family Services); and (5) non-organizational networks and online learning platforms (e.g., independent B’nai mitzvah or Hebrew tutors). By including all these sectors, the researchers’ goal is to not only provide unique insights about the nature of educators and their work, but also to test existing paradigms that see these sectors as distinct from and even exclusive of one another, rather than part of a larger whole.

The multi-year research project is funded with generous grants from the William Davidson Foundation and Jim Joseph Foundation.

CASJE is a community of researchers, practitioners, and philanthropic leaders committed to sharing knowledge to improve Jewish education. In addition to the William Davidson Foundation and Jim Joseph Foundation, CASJE receives support from The AVI CHAI Foundation and Crown Family Philanthropies, among others. The George Washington University serves as the administrative home for CASJE, enabling the specific goals of CASJE to be enriched by the academic and intellectual resources of a global, comprehensive, research university.  Along with this project, CASJE’s areas of inquiry include Jewish educational leadership, Jewish early childhood education, Hebrew language education, and Israel education.

CASJE’s Advisory Board includes co-chairs Dr. Michael Feuer and Rabbi Mitchel Malkus, and members Dr. Rena Dorph (UC Berkeley), Dr. Charles “Chip” Edelsberg, Dr. Sharon Feiman-Nemser (Brandeis University), Dr. Ellen Goldring (Vanderbilt University), Dr. Paul Goren (former superintendent of Evanston/Skokie School District 65), Dr. Ilana Horwitz (Stanford University), Dr. Benjamin Jacobs (The George Washington University), Dr. Susan Kardos (Abraham Joshua Heschel School) and Robert Sherman (formerly of The Jewish Education Project), a well as one emeritus member, Dr. Lee Shulman (Stanford University).

Source: CASJE

 

Hadar

In the midst of its second decade, Hadar offers a powerful, immersive Jewish text learning environment that empowers Jews to create vibrant, egalitarian communities of Torah, Avodah, and Hesed. In the last few years, in an increasingly socially fragmented world, Hadar has experienced unprecedented growth and demand for its programs. People are thirsty for Jewish content that authentically guides and inspires. In turn, Hadar learners want to share their meaningful experiences with others by creating community.

Hadar is a place where the Torah is sharp and the people are sweet, and being here has been an incredibly important and transformative experience for me. It’s one of the only places where I feel I can be honest about who I am and what I believe in and care about. I feel grateful to live in a world in which this beit midrash and this community exists.
– Alum of Hadar Fellowship

As Hadar implements an ambitious strategic plan–its annual budget now tops $6 million–new initiatives and programs continue to engage people with varying levels of knowledge, passions, and visions for future Jewish life. Hadar’s Rising Song Jewish Music Residency, a year-long immersive study program for students of Jewish music and spiritual tradition, trains musical change agents to cultivate Jewish spiritual life across the full, pluralistic range of Jewish expression. Its Moot Beit Din programs offers a unique mock-trial experience for halakhic debate in high schools and colleges. The Pedagogy of Partnership, powered by Hadar, focuses on relationship-centered education, training teachers to modify and advance their teaching practices. And the Advanced Kollel is for students with an extensive learning background committed to a multi-year intensive course of study.

More people than ever are engaging in these programs—there are over 600 alumni of Hadar’s summer and year-long fellowship programs, and 2,000 alumni of its dozen week-long programs. Hadar’s online podcasts, classes, and music offerings are downloaded by more than two million people annually. Hadar has also expanded regular programming outside New York in cities such as Washington, DC, Boston, Philadelphia and Jerusalem.

Hadar made me see the possibility of living a Jewish life that does not compromise my identity or my values.
– Participant in Hadar program

Hadar’s timely resources include a new High Holiday “reader,” a printable, designed, free collection of seasonal essays from their faculty. Hadar’s Israel operation is busy with its Elul program for university-age Israelis studying in an immersive all-Hebrew beit midrash setting that embodies Hadar’s vision of Jewish learning and an embrace of gender equality. And registration is open for Hadar’s second-ever National Shabbaton,  January 31, 2020, for a weekend of learning, community-building, prayer, and music. 

Deeply rooted in our texts and traditions, Hadar’s learning experiences are a creative response to contemporary questions and challenges. As Jews re-evaluate questions of identity and affiliation, Hadar is well-positioned to meet their needs and to impact diverse audiences through its vision of Torah that is uncompromisingly honest, spiritually meaningful, and socially responsible.

The Jim Joseph Foundation is a funder of Hadar. Access Hadar’s High Holiday reader here.

 

Getting to Sustainability: A Case Study of the Jewish New Teacher Project

One of the roles foundations play in American society is that of “venture capitalists” in the social sector. Bold, creative solutions to social and educational challenges almost always need funding to get started, and many foundations are available to provide the early capital. However, most foundations do not want to become long-term primary supporters of these start-ups because they need to free up their capital to support the next promising innovation. As a result, central to foundations’ visions of success is the sustainability of the new strategy or program through a combination of earned revenue, fundraising, and (where possible) government support. In the case of The AVI CHAI Foundation, which in North America supports Jewish day school education and overnight camping, the push for sustainability of our grantees also comes from our sunset, which prevents us from being perpetual funders. Over time, AVI CHAI, along with partner foundations, employed various strategies to help grantees work toward sustainability. I tell the story here of our work with the Jewish New Teacher Project to illustrate some of these strategies.

Background

When AVI CHAI began its investment in day school education in the mid-1990s, one challenge identified by school leaders was the difficulty in recruiting and then retaining quality teachers. In 2002, we teamed with the New Teacher Center (NTC), based in the University of California Santa Cruz, to take their proven two-year program of training mentors to support novice teachers in public schools and tailor it for Jewish day schools. The resultant “Jewish New Teacher Project” (JNTP) pilot launched in 2003 in the New York/New Jersey region, and early on proved similarly effective in building Jewish day schools’ capacity to help new teachers improve their craft and remain in the field. With the support of other funders, by its fifth year JNTP was training 50 mentors who were working with 100 novice teachers in 42 day schools within the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area.

With its model proven, JNTP then pursued two aims: scalability, first within and then beyond the NY/NJ area, and sustainability, through a realistic business model. Of course, these goals were sometimes in tension, especially when moving into new markets involved taking financial risk. But JNTP’s talented leadership and staff skillfully navigated the balance through both economic downturns and impressive growth. In AVI CHAI’s role of thought partner with JNTP, alongside other funders, sustainability was the northern star that guided our advice and support.

Below are some of the lessons we learned from working with JNTP’s leadership that might be helpful to other foundations looking to help effective programs become sustainable over time:

1) Grow sustainably: secure other funding partners and then expand. Many successful pilots are tempted to expand rapidly with the help of a single funder, and then seek to recruit other donors down the road. That, of course, increases dependency on the major donor. In JNTP’s case, even after the pilot proved effective, AVI CHAI resisted investing in quick expansion. instead, JNTP first recruited other funders or local communities to invest in the work before entering a new locale or type of school. Thus, New York’s UJA Federation and an anonymous donor were early partners to enable JNTP to reach more NY/NJ schools in the initial roll-out; the Jim Joseph Foundation early on supported bringing JNTP to day schools in the Baltimore-Washington corridor; and more recently, Crown Family Philanthropies enabled expansion into Chicago. At the same time, some programmatic elements that were helpful but ultimately unsustainable – such as visiting mentors where schools paid only a small fraction of the actual cost – were discontinued unless a donor explicitly stepped in to cover it. This past year, the program trained 150 mentors (who worked with 173 novice teachers) in 70 schools in 12 states, reaching over 19,000 Jewish day school students. Those figures are now the average annual impact of the program.

Happily, the relationship with the Jim Joseph Foundation around this project blossomed into a deep philanthropic partnership about eight years ago. AVI CHAI and the Jim Joseph Foundation began coordinating more closely, sharing the costs of recruiting new leadership and strategic planning in addition to general operating costs, and coordinating the schedule of reports and payments. Joint calls between the two foundations and JNTP’s leadership began as well, a practice that continues today. Finally, the Jim Joseph Foundation awarded a new grant to support JNTP in the first few years post-AVI CHAI.

In sum, even as JNTP was bold in its ambitions to reach as many Jewish day schools in North America as possible, it was also realistic and prepared to maintain managed growth, offering its services only where funding was available.

2) Help build the organization’s capacity and fund its business planning. As interest in JNTP’s services grew, first AVI CHAI, and beginning in 2012 the Jim Joseph Foundation, invested intentionally first in helping JNTP become an institutional presence with an office and address (initially, the program operated in the director’s home) and then in building the organization’s capacity – an area that has generally become a focus of the foundation’s philanthropy (see Yossi Prager’s blogpost). We funded a part-time development professional whose hours grew as the program reached more schools. We also funded program evaluation, including longitudinal research that provided the data showing the program’s impact on teacher retention, as a way of helping JNTP makes its case to other funders. When there was a mid-year change of leadership, AVI CHAI and the Jim Joseph Foundation partnered to pay for a headhunting firm to identify the next director – one with experience in shepherding successful start-ups to sustainability. Part of my work as program officer was to make sure – gently but relentlessly – that the long-term planning and infrastructure issues received the same attention as did the delivery of first-rate teacher support.

Funding for business planning was also a crucial part of capacity-building. JNTP’s rapid growth necessitated this work, though it had to wait until NTC (JNTP’s parent organization) completed its own strategic planning model as it became an independent organization. In 2013, as JNTP was nearing its 10th anniversary, Jim Joseph Foundation and AVI CHAI funded the development of a thorough 5-year business plan, complete with detailed benchmarks and projected budgets, that formed the basis of our two foundations’ general operating support of JNTP. Consistent with the business plan, our joint support was more robust in the first years of the plan and then tapered off considerably as revenues and other philanthropic support increased. In 2018, as the first business plan was nearing its end, Jim Joseph Foundation, AVI CHAI and JNTP itself shared the cost of developing another (6-year) plan that would chart how JNTP would manage through, and following, AVI CHAI’s sunset.

3) Generate earned revenue and broaden the donor base – gradually. Given the untested nature of this service, it was reasonable in the pilot phase for AVI CHAI and its partners not to ask schools to share in the monetary costs of the program. However, as JNTP began to prove its value, we felt strongly that schools needed to have skin in the game and to pay for the training of its professionals and the support of novice teachers. This “ask” was intentionally done gradually and incrementally, so that schools had time to see JNTP as a service whose fees were worth building into their budgets. To be sure, the 2008-10 economic crisis called for the major funders to step in and cover a shortfall created by schools pulling out or reducing their contributions; as believers in the long-term value proposition, we wanted JNTP to weather the storm. Nevertheless, while philanthropic support is still necessary (especially for smaller or less-resourced schools), revenue from schools – which constituted 18.4% of the $1M budget in 2014-15 and 29% of the $1.2M budget three years later – is a substantial base upon which to build.

Reducing dependence on its primary donors was another facet of the strategic plan. JNTP’s director and development staff were trained in fundraising techniques early on in the first business plan. The kernel of a lay advisory board was planted and has since expanded. In the four years between 2014-15 and 2017-18, the amount of philanthropic funding provided by foundations and donors beyond AVI CHAI and the Jim Joseph Foundation doubled from 15% of the total budget to 30%, bringing AVI CHAI’s and Jim Joseph Foundation’s portion of the budget to under 20% each last year.

4) Know the program and communicate regularly – in a supportive yet candid way. Since 1994, much of AVI CHAI’s day school philanthropy launched innovative programs and start-up organizations to positively impact the field. Rather than merely writing checks, the Foundation’s program officers were charged with learning as much as possible about each program and serving as a supportive thought partner to the grantee. In the case of JNTP, AVI CHAI staff attended JNTP mentor training days and spoke with mentors, novice teachers and even administrators to understand what was working in their schools and what could be improved. Frequent communication between AVI CHAI’s program officer and JNTP’s leadership was conducted in the spirit of Kim Scott’s Radical Candor, pairing encouragement and affirmation with frank communication about current practice and future directions. Such intimate knowledge of the program – vital in the early stages of a program but no less critical as the program matured – helped AVI CHAI staff earn the trust of JNTP’s leadership, as well as the confidence of AVI CHAI’s board that JNTP was indeed worthy of ongoing and deeper investment.

5. Be nimble and patient. I mentioned above that AVI CHAI stepped in to cover the budget shortfall created by the 2008-09 financial crisis. There were other times, too, when adjustments to realities were needed. For instance, the first year of JNTP’s first business plan happened to coincide with NTC’s decision to overhaul its curriculum and tools, overly stretching JNTP’s staff who now had to learn and adopt the new content. When we learned of the impact on the staff, we supported a slight increase in staff time to accommodate the new load. On the other side of the ledger, when an unexpected revenue stream materialized, the two foundations encouraged JNTP to bank surplus funds that JNTP could use in leaner times. Lastly, not long into the first business plan, a change in the leadership of NTC, the parent organization, raised the question of whether JNTP would continue to be seen as falling within NTC’s mission. With that question and the evolving landscape of supporting organizations for day schools as a backdrop, JNTP wondered whether it should stay within NTC, branch out on its own, or align with another institution. JNTP’s leadership was right to raise these points. AVI CHAI and Jim Joseph Foundation served as thought partners, hiring a consultant to consider all options for this strategic decision (in the end, NTC’s new leadership was very comfortable with JNTP remaining in their organization, so the status quo remains). Planning is crucial, but flexibility and patience on the part of funders gives competent professionals, such as JNTP’s leaders, the confidence to make strategic, thoughtful decisions.

With just a few months until AVI CHAI ceases its grantmaking, JNTP’s future looks bright. Catalyzing a trend from general education to support novice teachers in Jewish day schools, JNTP – through its compelling induction model, significant impact, and talented staff – has met and even exceeded several programmatic and development benchmarks set forth in the first business plan. Moreover, in anticipation of AVI CHAI’s spenddown, JNTP’s leadership has ably steered the organization towards greater sustainability. We believe the philanthropic approach AVI CHAI and others took contributed to this outcome (a similar story has been told with respect to our work in overnight summer camps). JNTP’s story, told from AVI CHAI’s perspective, is a paradigm of how foundations can help proven programs advance towards sustainability.

Michael S. Berger is a Program Officer at The AVI CHAI Foundation – North America.

An Audacious Roadmap: Reboot at 18

Can cultural reinvention galvanize the Jewish world? This year, we will unleash the answer as Reboot rolls out a whole host of new initiatives dedicated to reinvigorating and “rebooting” Jewish life through creative expression.

My entire career has been dedicated to elevating the artistic voice. As a Grammy-nominated producer and former Vice President of A&R at Warner Bros. Records, I had a front row seat watching artists as they wove their ideas into the public consciousness using different platforms and formats. I saw music change our world.

When I encountered Reboot, I saw a model that could be replicated.

Since 2001, Reboot has provided new generations access to unique Jewish moments by investing in successful artists, makers, scholars, and entrepreneurs. These inspiring individuals who comprise our network have prompted the development of many big Jewish ideas and helped usher them into the world. When faced with the challenge of reaching a growing cohort of Jews not actively engaged in Jewish life, we discovered a way to incorporate Jewish traditions and rituals into a familiar language and setting. We created interactive experiences correlating with the digital age.

My unexpected personal journey as a Rebooter – from participant to board member to board president to CEO – continues to energize me. Eighteen years since its founding, the Reboot Network is now over 600 strong. The projects that have come from the network have engaged millions of people, the majority of whom are not the typical Jewish “user.” The individuals we reached have found relevance, reflection, and deep connection through reimagined Jewish rituals, traditions, and culture. You can get on overview of our work and its value through this recently created video.

Several of our defining projects and initiatives continue to have a substantial impact to this day. They include:

  • The National Day of Unplugging (NDU): Developed by a group of artists, writers, and filmmakers (originally under a program called The Sabbath Manifesto) the NDU started a movement when it launched 10 years ago. This movement incorporated the weekly celebration of Shabbat as an opportunity to take respite from technology. Since 2009, hundreds of thousands of participants have joined us, including tech elites who are stirring a change in the role of technology in our lives.
  • 10Q: Born from a conversation between writer Ben Greenman and wellness guru Nicola Berman, 10Q offers a new High Holiday experience for the increasing thousands who want to draw on the Jewish commitment for reflection, gratitude and personal responsibility while taking themselves out of the pews (note: many in the pews love it as well!).
  • Sukkah City: This international architectural design competition and art installation, created by journalist and best-selling author Joshua Foer, launched in the fall of 2010. Sukkah City re-imagined the sukkah in contemporary design. A committee of distinguished art critics and leading architects selected 12 winners from a field of over 600 submissions. The winning entries were displayed in New York’s Union Square Park and drew an audience of over 250,000 attendees.
  • Black Sabbath – The Secret Musical History of Black-Jewish Relations: Premiering at the Contemporary Jewish Museum in 2010, the exhibit drew over 200,000 people and shared the Black-Jewish musical encounter from the 1930s to the 1960s. We have plans to refresh this project, with the unique local context of Detroit, in 2021.

In celebration of our Chai year, we have launched a new strategic plan designed to take Reboot into the future. We are grateful for the generous support that the Jim Joseph Foundation and the Righteous Persons Foundation provided for the planning process. We are refining our focus, doubling down on supporting artists who encourage challenging questions, and reimagining Judaism. An executive summary of this new plan is available here.

We will continue to do what we do best: own the Jewish R&D space by using the power of arts and culture to elevate the Jewish conversation and connect with the Jews on the margins. Moving forward. we’ll be putting more energy into engaging and empowering our network. We know the Jewish world is ever changing and Reboot is positioned at the intersection of our community’s diverse history, culture, identity, and creativity.

Our new Mission statement: Reboot reimagines, reinvents and reinforces Jewish culture and traditions for wandering Jews and the world we live in.

Coming soon:

  • The Reboot Network – We will continue to grow an influential group of individuals steeped in cultural frontiers across the U.S. and around the world.
  • The Reboot Ideas Festival – The first public embodiment of Reboot’s audacious, heart-felt and uncensored conversations and experiences. This is a weekend experience in San Francisco (March 27th-28th, 2020) focused on remixing, rethinking, and reimagining Judaism’s past, present, and future. We have invited creators, strategists, writers, thinkers, makers and artists, to propel, amplify, and evolve the Jewish conversation.
  • Reboot Studios – The stand-out ideas that emerge from the Ideas Festival and other areas of our network will be developed and implemented through our recently formed studio. This studio will test programs and products to assess their impact and growth.
  • My Fiddler Story, a project that explores the current refugee crisis through the prism of the acclaimed musical, Fiddler on the Roof.
  • Silver Screen Studios, an intergenerational celebration of mini-documentaries that teaches and exposes young people to the wisdom of the Jewish community’s elders.
  • Reboot Fellowships – Reboot will expand thanks to the generosity of the Covenant Foundation by bringing members of our network to Jewish institutions and collections, remixing their holdings for new generations.

We know that the Jewish world is ever changing, and arts and culture drive our changing world. Reboot is at the intersection of Jewish change and arts and culture.

For 18 years, Reboot has curated its growing network of creative and thoughtful leaders to develop and execute impactful projects relevant to today’s ideologies. We have inspired our community members to apply their unique and formidable talents to reimagine and reinvent Judaism. We ask that they share their discoveries with all of us, wandering Jews, and the world. With our new strategic plan, we are streamlining our historic model to ensure optimal success into the next decade and beyond.

More Sukkah Cities. More NDUs and 10Qs. More remixing of rituals, traditions, and new ways of plugging into the source of Jewish ideas by enlisting the greatest artists of our day to create game-changing opportunities. We are excited about where we are headed. WILL WE SEE YOU THERE?

David Katznelson is CEO at Reboot.

Source: “An Audacious Roadmap: Reboot at 18,” David Katznelson, eJewishPhilanthropy, September 3, 2019

Berkeley Institute for Jewish Law and Israel Studies

With a pioneering model of teaching and programming, the Berkeley Institute for Jewish Law and Israel Studies engages students and faculty in a rich environment of learning, research, and unique public events. In just eight years, the Institute has transitioned from a start-up to a permanent presence that cultivates young Jewish leadership and continues to change the landscape of Israel studies on campus and in the larger community.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TrLY5eUhGE&feature=youtu.be

The Institute offers numerous paths for meaningful student and faculty engagement, including opportunities for research, teaching, programming, and mentorship.  The Institute brings visiting faculty and scholars to campus and organizes classes, lectures, colloquia, and conferences to strengthen academic inquiry and discourse around Israel and Jewish topics. 

Visiting Israeli faculty and scholars offer courses and mentorship in diverse fields of interest, including Geography, Political Science, Anthropology, Near Eastern Studies, Jewish Studies, Law, and Economics. The Institute’s Undergraduate Fellows Program fosters a growing cohort of student leaders that in turn create programs and courses for their peers. This cohort will now be able to take advantage of the Institute’s developing  experiential learning program in Israel, which will include on-site coursework and internships with a focus on social change.

It’s great to have such constant offerings from the Institute. These events have piqued my interest in Jewish and Israel topics and I find that I seek out other opportunities to learn more, outside of campus. I’ve always been interested in the news even before being part of the Institute, but now there is a good chance I’ll stay actively involved in keeping up with academic literature that deals with Israel and international relations.
– UC Berkeley Student

In recent years, the Institute hosted the annual meeting of the Association for Israel Studies, brought Israeli Supreme Court Justice Daphne Barak-Erez as The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation Scholar-in-Residence, sponsored courses ranging from Israeli Constitutional Law to Religion in Israel, and hosted up to five stellar visiting professors per year to teach and mentor in their areas of expertise.

Staff are amazing at being resources for us even outside of the class and lectures. . . If there is something I want to do that is Israel- or Jewish-related, they’ll go out of their way. The Institute feels like family. At this point, they’ve been instrumental in shaping my college experience.
– UC Berkeley Student

In the 2019-2020 academic year, the Institute will expand and diversify undergraduate courses, student programs, academic programs, and especially experiential learning opportunities. This also is the first year in which Professor Ron Hassner, the Institute’s faculty co-director, will serve as the new Helen Diller Family Chair in Israel Studies.

The Berkeley Institute made academic study of Judaism and Israel a legitimate field of study and discourse on the Berkeley campus. It put Jewish studies and Israel studies back on the map. In the last 3 years alone the Institute has exposed to us for the first time Israel’s water policies, Israel’s high tech, Israel’s supreme court, Israel’s philosophy. These were things you could talk about and research.
– Faculty Member

The Berkeley Institute for Jewish Law and Israel Studies receives support from the Jim Joseph Foundation. Learn more about the Institute.

 

 

Reflecting on Partnership and Belonging During My Time at the Jim Joseph Foundation

In reflecting about my journey at the Jim Joseph Foundation – these last 4 ½ years – an insight from Mother Teresa comes to mind. Indeed, after a lifetime of working with the poor, the sick, and the vulnerable, Mother Teresa observed that, “The biggest disease today is not leprosy or tuberculosis but rather the feeling of not belonging.” What makes this observation even more powerful is that she died in 1997 – before the digital revolution really took hold, before cell phones, social media, and widespread online communities.

It is no surprise to most of us that this disease – this notion of not belonging – has reached epidemic proportions. Type in “loneliness epidemic” into google and a flurry of articles pop up – and countries are beginning to think about how to confront the issue. Just one example, in 2018, the U.K. appointed a Loneliness Minister, Tracey Crouch, to help combat the country’s chronic loneliness problem.

We long to belong.

The Jim Joseph Foundation has been on a journey itself that intersected with my own – one that has led to a stated aspiration of working with grantee-partners to help all Jews, their families and their friends lead connected, meaningful, purpose-filled lives and to make positive contributions to their communities and the world. The Foundation is looking to help fund, support, and build meaningful connection in our lives. In my own journey of wrestling with this meaning-based connection, the Jewish theologian Martin Buber has been particularly illustrative. At the core of Buber’s theology is his theory of dialogue – the idea that entering into relationship with one another is essential – because in doing so one enters into a relationship with G-d. Buber famously speaks to what he calls the “I-It” vs the “I-You” – the “I-It” characterized as how most of us tend to operate in daily life; we tend to treat the people and the world around us as things to be used for our benefit. Sometimes this is very appropriate. After all, a toothbrush is meant for my benefit (and the benefit of those around me, I might add). But what about a person? Buber speaks to the notion of the “I-You” as addressing other people directly as partners in dialogue and relationship. Only when we say “You” to our world can we perceive its eccentricity and peculiarity and, simultaneously, its potential for intimacy.

In my time at the Foundation, I attempted to carry myself with the words “I-You” on my lips. Indeed, what does it mean to be a true partner given the power and perch that comes from being positioned at a large institutional funder? These are questions that the sector would do well, in my opinion, to keep asking – as I think they remain increasingly pertinent and meaningful, particularly in a universe where our work is about furnishing the hearth of connection. This question of partnership is at the center of what effective grantmaking is concerned with. Phil Buchanan, in his latest book, Giving Done Right (in my humble opinion a book that should be required reading for all who enter the philanthropic field), discusses what it takes to build effective relationships with grantee-partners. He provides ten rules based on his organization’s, the Center for Effective Philanthropy (CEP), surveys of tens of thousands of grantee-partners about hundreds of grantmakers. One of the ten in particular spoke to me: Don’t assume you have what it takes to strengthen nonprofits or build their capabilities. Ask what they need and then offer it only if you’re positioned to do it well. As grantmakers we like to think we know something. And often we do. And often we actually don’t know as much as we think we know. Just as the heart pumps blood through our body, providing it with oxygen and nutrients, our grantee-partners pump their lived experience, their work, and their knowledge to the philanthropic sector. We would be wise to listen and when we think we are listening to actually listen more.

In their book Stories of the Spirit, Jack Kornfield and Christina Feldman tell this story: A family went out to a restaurant for dinner. When the waitress arrived, the parents gave their orders, where then immediately their five-year-old daughter piped up with her own: “I’ll have a hot dog, french fries, and a Coke.” “Oh no you won’t,” interjected the parents, and turning to the waitress said, “She’ll have meat loaf, mashed potatoes, milk.” Looking at the child with a smile, the waitress said, “So hon, what do you want on that hot dog?” When she left, the family sat stunned and silent. A few moments later the little girl, eyes shining, said, “She thinks I’m real.”

Who do we believe is real in our communities? My sense, for one reason or another, is many of us have been treated like the daughter was by the parents. A question that I find myself coming back to again and again – how can I be more real and see people in all their miraculous realness? Moving from the individual to the sector perspective, this story is also illustrative of the ways in which many of us in the philanthropic sector see the nonprofit universe. Business-type thinking permeates the nonprofit world. As Phil Buchanan notes, “What we need today is a further clarifying – not a blurring – of the boundaries between the sectors. Each sector plays a distinct role. We live in a market economy, but markets have limits – and markets fail – and that’s why the nonprofit sector is so crucial.” I couldn’t agree more. No sector is superior, and the pursuit of profit and that of social impact ends may not always conflict, but they often do. As Buchanan says, “Nonprofits are often working to address the very problems markets have failed to address. So, it makes little sense to maintain that ”market approaches” are the answer to every problem.” This is often difficult for philanthropists and principals – the vast majority of them who made their fortunes in the market world – to come to terms with. And naturally so, we are hardwired to think that what worked in one situation could work in another. In philanthropy we have many examples to the contrary and more being created each and every day.

Which brings me to my last story. The psychologist and author Tara Brach writes in her work, Radical Acceptance: Mohini was a regal white tiger who lived for many years at the National Zoo in Washington, D.C. For the majority of those years, her home was the old lion house, a typical twelve-by-twelve foot cage with iron bars and a cement floor. Mohini’s days consisted of pacing restlessly back and forth in her cramped quarters. Eventually, the Zoo staff worked together to create a natural habitat for her, covering several acres with hills, trees, a pond and a variety of vegetation. With excitement and anticipation, they released Mohini into her new and expansive environment. But it was too late. The tiger immediately sought refuge in a corner of the compound, where she lived for the remainder of her life. Mohini paced and paced in that corner until an area twelve by twelve feet was worn bare of grass.

So many of us find ourselves trapped in the same old patterns. The same old thinking. So many of us find our institutions trapped in the same old patterns. The same old thinking. For all of us in the Jewish communal sector, what would it look like to realize that we are actually living in an expansive wilderness and acting as if we live in a cage of our own making?

It was a privilege to be a part of and contributor to this Foundation’s work for the last 4 ½ years, to have been a colleague and a partner to many organizations and individuals in the world of Jewish education, and to continue to be inspired by the work of our grantee partners in the field – you all are the champions that made coming to work each and every day at the Jim Joseph Foundation the best job a guy could have.

Jeff Tiell was a Program Officer at the Jim Joseph Foundation until August, 2019. He can be reached now at [email protected].